Finding Force Exerted by Photons on a Sphere

cupid.callin
Messages
1,130
Reaction score
1
I was given this question in my book …
A sphere of radius 1cm is placed in path of light of large aperture. The intensity of light is 0.5W/cm^2. The sphere completely absorbs photons falling on it. Find the force exerted by them on the sphere.
I solved the question and I have given the solution in the pic. Please have a look.

_________________________________________________________

Next there was another question given below it …
The same sphere is placed in same light but this time the sphere is not perfectly absorbing. Show that the force exerted by photons remains the same.

Well I have no idea how to prove the second one. Please someone help .
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
that is easy, but you need a little more complicated calculus.
i think that this time it is a perfectly reflecting surface (a mirror) than it will reflect photons in all directions. there will be a spherical symetry, we can consider rings which will have same reflecting angles starting from r=0 to r=R (radius of sphere)
for an arbitrary r angle that is between line that is parallel to path of photons and normal is arcsin(r/R)
the area of that ring is 2(pi)rdr
if you draw what i explained, you will see that angle of reflected photon is 2.arcsin(r/R) call this angle 2(theta)
so momentum of one of reflected photons is -(h/lambda)cos(2theta) right? i couldn't follow your notation but let's assume there are n photons per unit area
Ptotalx=int(0toR) [-2(pi)n.r.h.cos(2arcsin(r/R))/lambda]dr
that will give sum of x components of momentums of reflected photons, you need deltaP to find force
it is Pinitial-Pfinal. Pfinal is result of the integral, P initial is what you found on you paper. I am sure you will understand the concept because at you notes you have wrote that Pfinal is 0 since photons are absorbed, here it is simple not zero. But these two do never give the same result.
 
Thanks a lot sigmaro!

I really helped ... question is solved!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top