Finding friction on a onedimensional tube

  • Thread starter Thread starter ShizukaSm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction Tube
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the friction coefficient between two surfaces in contact with a one-dimensional tube. The main issue arises from the confusion in selecting the correct direction for the friction force, which significantly impacts the resulting calculations. When the wrong direction is assumed, it leads to incorrect values for the friction coefficient. The correct approach involves recognizing that friction opposes the relative motion of surfaces, which can clarify the direction of forces involved. Ultimately, reversing the assumed directions of friction could yield valid alternative solutions, albeit with potentially negative coefficients.
ShizukaSm
Messages
85
Reaction score
0
PRobStatem.JPG

Find the friction coefficient between the bar and the surfaces. Both surfaces are equal (and thus have equal coefficients).

Ok so, my problem is that, generally in physics when I assume an wrong direction for a vector, I will be able to discover that in my answer (generally speaking the vector will be negative), however, in this question assuming a wrong direction will give me a completely wrong answer and I don't understand why this happens or how to define the right orientation right from the start.

My original trial:
MySolution.JPG

\\\sum F_x = 0 \rightarrow N_a\mu_e + Nb\left(-\mu_e \cos(\theta)-\sin(\theta) \right ) = 0<br /> \\\sum F_y = 0 \rightarrow N_a + N_b(\cos(\theta)-\mu_e \sin(\theta)) = W<br /> \\\sum \tau_A = 0 \rightarrow W = \frac{N_b}{\sin(\theta)}<br /> \\<br /> \\<br /> \mu_e = 0.569345 \text{ or } \mu_e = -1.75641


Book (I suppose it's also the correct one):
BookSolution.jpg

\\\sum F_x = 0 \rightarrow N_a\mu_e + Nb\left(+^{[1]}\mu_e \cos(\theta)-\sin(\theta) \right ) = 0<br /> \\\sum F_y = 0 \rightarrow N_a + N_b(\cos(\theta)+^{[2]}\mu_e \sin(\theta)) = W<br /> \\\sum \tau_A = 0 \rightarrow W = \frac{N_b}{\sin(\theta)}<br /> \\\text{Only differences in [1] and [2].}<br /> \\<br /> \mu_e = 0.225979 \text{ or } \mu_e = 4.42518
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem arises when you select whether FB is + or - NBμecos(θ). As soon as you choose which, you have specified which way that force acts in relation to FA.
You can determine the direction easily from first principles. Friction always acts to oppose relative motion of the surfaces in contact. If it acts downwards at the top of the rod that must be because, in the absence of friction, the rod would slide upwards. But since the rod is of fixed length, that would mean the base of the rod would slide towards the vertical face. To get a valid alternative solution you must reverse both friction directions. I would guess that will then give you the correct solution but with the coefficient negative.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top