Finding g on unknown planet given only total time and a random height

AI Thread Summary
To determine the acceleration due to gravity (g) on an unknown planet, a ball is thrown upward and passes a windowsill 11.0 m high twice, with a total time of 5.00 seconds for its journey. The initial attempts at solving the problem involved incorrect equations and assumptions about average velocity. A more effective approach involves using the equations of motion, specifically s=ut+(1/2)at^2 and s=vt-(1/2)at^2, to derive expressions for initial velocity and acceleration. The discussion emphasizes the importance of careful application of kinematic equations to solve for g accurately. Ultimately, the problem requires systematic trial and error to arrive at the correct solution.
tswvyimlis
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Been working on this for the past hour or so and seem to be going in circles; finally decided to call in the cavalry:

You land on an unknown planet somewhere in the universe that clearly has weaker gravity than Earth. To measure g on this planet you do the following experiment: A ball is thrown upward from the ground. It passes a windowsill 11.0 m above ground and is seen to pass by the same windowsill 2.00 s after it went by on its way up. It reaches the ground again 5.00 s after it was thrown. Calculate the magnitude of g (the acceleration due to gravity) at the surface of this planet.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
The cavalry can't help you without first seeing your attempt at a solution! What formulas are you tinkering with?
 
Sorry, my first attempt was flawed because I mistakenly equated Vavg.= (Vfinal+Vinitial)/2 and from that eventually came up with the equation 4t*deltaY*(2Vfinal-Vavg)+Vavg=Vfinal and used the reference point of t=1.5s and y=11m to solve for Vfinal. That (probably obviously) didn't work so now I've used the equation y=Vi+Vi*t+(1/2)at2 after I plugged in the same reference point I got it down to a=(11-2.5Vi)/(1.125).

I can't seem to get past here. Thanks!
 
I agree, this one takes a bit of thinking and some trial and error!

My hint would be that you need to use s=ut+\frac{1}{2}at^2 (1) and s=vt-\frac{1}{2}at^2 (2). Using these, you can get an expression for u in terms of a, and then put back into (1) to finally get an answer.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top