Finding gravitational potential inside solid sphere

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating gravitational potential and force inside and outside a solid sphere, specifically Earth. The gravitational potential outside the sphere is derived as -CM/r, while inside, it involves a constant D and the mass of the shells not enclosing the mass m. The user initially finds two different values for the constant CM, leading to confusion about the calculations. Upon reevaluation, it is determined that the potential for the case inside the Earth was incorrectly calculated, particularly the term D. After correcting the calculations, the user confirms that both cases yield the same value for CM.
demonelite123
Messages
216
Reaction score
0
So I am given that the gravitational potential of a mass m a distance r away from the center of a spherical shell with mass m' is -Cm'/r for m outside the shell and constant for m inside ths shell.

I am to find the potentials inside and outside a solid sphere (the earth) of radius R as well as the gravitational force inside and outside on a mass m.

I thought of the Earth as a lot of spherical shells of mass dm so if the mass of the solid sphere is M, i integrated for example -Cdm/r from m = 0 to m = M to get -CM/r outside the sphere. Then taking the negative gradient, i find F = (-CM/r2) er. Then since the gravitational force on the surface of the Earth is -mg, i see that -CM/R2) = -mg or CM = mgR2.

now for inside the sphere, i have the potential to be D - CM'/r where D is a constant (due to the shells that enclose the mass m) and M' is the total mass of the shells that do not enclose the mass m. since the sphere has uniform density, we have M'/M = r3/R3 so the potential is D - CMr2/R3. Taking the negative gradient once again, i get 2CMr/R3 and since the force at the surface is -mg, i get 2CM/R2 = -mg or CM = (-1/2)mgR2.

but earlier, i got that the constant CM = mgR2.

why does my constant CM have 2 different values? have i done something wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i think i figured it out. i didn't calculate the potential correctly for the case that m was inside the earth. while my -CM'/r was correct, the term D was incorrect. after correctly calculating the potential due to all the shells that enclose the mass m, i do indeed get the same value of CM as i did in the other case.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top