Finding Height (KE vs. Work by Gravity)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a thin solid disk rolling up an inclined plane. The problem requires calculating the maximum height the disk reaches, using principles of kinetic energy and work done by gravity. The scenario includes parameters such as the disk's radius, mass, initial speed, and the angle of the incline.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between kinetic energy and gravitational potential energy, questioning how to correctly apply the work-energy principle. There are attempts to derive equations for height using energy conservation, and some participants express confusion about the signs in their equations and the necessity of certain parameters.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, exploring different interpretations of the energy equations. Some guidance has been offered regarding the conservation of mechanical energy, and there is a recognition of the importance of sign conventions in the equations used. However, there is no explicit consensus on the correct approach or final answer.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the correct answer being 2.6 m, but some participants arrive at different values, indicating potential misunderstandings or misapplications of the energy equations. The discussion reflects uncertainty about the assumptions and definitions involved in the problem.

johnhuntsman
Messages
76
Reaction score
0
A thin solid disk of radius R = 0.5 m and mass M = 2.0 kg is rolling without slipping on a horizontal surface with a linear speed v = 5.0 m/s. The disk now rolls without slipping up an inclined plane that is at an angle of 60 degrees to the vertical. Calculate the maximum height that the disk rolls up the incline.

The disk will stop when kinetic energy K equals the work done by gravity Wg.

R = 0.5m
M = 2.0kg
v = 5.0m / s
θ = 60°
I = (1 / 2)MR2
ω = v / R
K = (1 / 2)Iω2 + (1 / 2)Mv2
Wg = mgh = mgdcosθ

The fact the θ to the vertical is given suggests that I'm meant to find h using it, but it seems to me that I wouldn't actually need it. However solving for h that way doesn't get me the right answer which makes me think I need to use it somehow. Can someone please help?

P.S. The correct answer is 2.6m.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
johnhuntsman said:
A thin solid disk of radius R = 0.5 m and mass M = 2.0 kg is rolling without slipping on a horizontal surface with a linear speed v = 5.0 m/s. The disk now rolls without slipping up an inclined plane that is at an angle of 60 degrees to the vertical. Calculate the maximum height that the disk rolls up the incline.

The disk will stop when kinetic energy K equals the work done by gravity Wg.

R = 0.5m
M = 2.0kg
v = 5.0m / s
θ = 60°
I = (1 / 2)MR2
ω = v / R
K = (1 / 2)Iω2 + (1 / 2)Mv2
Wg = mgh = mgdcosθ

The fact the θ to the vertical is given suggests that I'm meant to find h using it, but it seems to me that I wouldn't actually need it. However solving for h that way doesn't get me the right answer which makes me think I need to use it somehow. Can someone please help?

P.S. The correct answer is 2.6m.
You are asked to solve for h. Is the work done by gravity positive or negative?? Write out your work-energy equation and please show your work.
 
It should be negative.

(1 / 2)Iω2 + (1 / 2)Mv2 - Mgh = 0J

or

(1 / 2)Iω2 + (1 / 2)Mv2 = Mgh

or

(1 / 2)Iω2 + (1 / 2)Mv2 = Mgdcosθ

[Edit]
With stuff substituted in:
(1 / 2)(1 / 2)MR2(v / R)2 + (1 / 2)Mv2 = Mgdcosθ

Simplifying:
(1 / 4)MR2(v / R)2 + (1 / 2)Mv2 = Mgdcosθ

(1 / 4)R2(v / R)2 + (1 / 2)v2 = gdcosθ

(1 / 4)v2 + (1 / 2)v2 = gdcosθ

(3 / 4)v2 = gdcosθ

[(3 / 4)v2] / g = dcosθ

What then?
[Edit]
 
Last edited:
That will give you the correct answer for h, and since you are not asked to solve for d, you don't need the last equation. But, you are nonetheless not using your energy equation correctly. In the absence of work done by non conservative forces, what equation are you using? Work is a function of the change in energy.
 
PhanthomJay said:
That will give you the correct answer for h, and since you are not asked to solve for d, you don't need the last equation. But, you are nonetheless not using your energy equation correctly. In the absence of work done by non conservative forces, what equation are you using? Work is a function of the change in energy.

I'm afraid I don't understand. Kinetic energy will have changed into gravitational protential energy because of the work gravity has done on it between the bottom of the incline and the point on the incline where the disk stops. That is a change in energy isn't it? At least in kinetic energy right?

[Edit] The equation gives me h = 1.9m as opposed to h = 2.6m which is the correct answer. [Edit]
 
Last edited:
When gravity is the only force acting that does work, which is your case here, then total mechanical energy is conserved, and you can use eiither of the following 2 equations:

1. [itex]W_g = \Delta KE[/itex] or
2. [itex]\Delta KE + \Delta PE =0[/itex]

Neither equation applies if work is being done by other forces like friction or applied forces. I am not sure if you have studied this yet.

But if you examine either equation above, they are not quite the same as the equation you gave in your solution. It's a signage thing related to the change, which becomes extremely important for the more general class of problems.
 
PhanthomJay said:
When gravity is the only force acting that does work, which is your case here, then total mechanical energy is conserved, and you can use eiither of the following 2 equations:

1. [itex]W_g = \Delta KE[/itex] or
2. [itex]\Delta KE + \Delta PE =0[/itex]

Neither equation applies if work is being done by other forces like friction or applied forces. I am not sure if you have studied this yet.

But if you examine either equation above, they are not quite the same as the equation you gave in your solution. It's a signage thing related to the change, which becomes extremely important for the more general class of problems.

So does that change the equation I used in anyway, or should I simply know this because it will be germane later. Also, is the h I arrived at correct or not? The correct answer section has been wrong several times before and I just want to hear it from someone educated that it probably is wrong.
 
johnhuntsman said:
So does that change the equation I used in anyway, or should I simply know this because it will be germane later.
Using the work = change in KE approach, -mgh = (0 - ((1/2)mv^2 + (1/2)Iω^2)), which is the same equation you have.
Also, is the h I arrived at correct or not? The correct answer section has been wrong several times before and I just want to hear it from someone educated that it probably is wrong.
The center of the disc rises 1.9 m from its start point before it stops. I am unsure where the 2.6 m comes from.
 
Alright then. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K