Finding initial wavelength of photo given angle of deflection

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the initial wavelength of a photon that loses half its energy during Compton scattering at a 90-degree angle. The user initially struggles with the problem due to a lack of information about the initial energy or kinetic energy. They utilize Compton's formula and realize that halving the energy affects the wavelength. Eventually, they successfully solve the problem by applying the equations E=mc² and E=hf, leading to a determination of the frequency and subsequently the wavelength. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding energy relationships in photon interactions.
negation
Messages
817
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




Find the initial wavelength of a photon that loses half its energy when it Compton-scatters from an electron and emerges at 90∘ to its initial direction of motion.



The Attempt at a Solution



Ei = Ef +KE
Ei = 0.5Ei + KE

Using compton's formula for scattering of photon:

Δλ = λf - λi = 2.42444x10-12 m

λi = λf - 2.42444x10-12 m

pretty much stuck. If I know the initia energy, find the initial wavelength would be a breeze but I don't have that information. Or if I know the numerical value of KE, I can by KE = 0.5Ei, find initial wavelength.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What did you do with the 90 degrees information ?

[edit] Oops, already used. Good. So what does halving the energy do to the wavelength of a photon ?
 
Last edited:
BvU said:
What did you do with the 90 degrees information ?

[edit] Oops, already used. Good. So what does halving the energy do to the wavelength of a photon ?

not really sure if I will incur the wrath of the moderators but I already solved it.

The key was introducing E=mc2 and E = hf
one learnts that f could be found.
f is also equals to c/λ and with this λ could be found.
 
Well done. No reasons for our good moderating spirits to get excited at all !
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top