Finding Intersections: Subsitution Method Help

  • Thread starter Thread starter bob4000
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To solve the intersection of the equations 3x + 4y = 33 and 2y = x - 1 using the substitution method, first rewrite 2y as y = (x - 1)/2. This allows for substitution into the first equation. Alternatively, you can express x in terms of y by rearranging to x = 2y + 1, which can also be substituted into the first equation. Both methods are valid and lead to the same solution. Understanding these substitution techniques is key to solving such equations effectively.
bob4000
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
i need some help with the following:

i know how to calculate the intersections when an equation like 3x+4y=33, y=x-1. but what do i do when y=x-1 becomes 2y=x-1; all of this using the substitution method. thnx
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If 2y = x - 1 then y = (x - 1)/2 = 0.5x - 0.5.
 
thts what thought but it doesn't seem to correlate with the answers in the textbook. i'll try again. thnx all the same
 
bob4000 said:
i need some help with the following:

i know how to calculate the intersections when an equation like 3x+4y=33, y=x-1. but what do i do when y=x-1 becomes 2y=x-1; all of this using the substitution method. thnx

There are two simple ways to substitute.

First, you can add 1 to both sides of the second equation:
2y + 1 = x - 1 + 1
2y + 1 = x
So now you can substitute 2y+1 instead of x in the first equation.

Another way would be to multiply both sides with 1/2:
2y * 1/2 = (x - 1) * 1/2
y = (x-1)/2
Now you can substitute (x-1)/2 instead of y.

Remember, you are allowed to add the same number to both sides, and to multiply both sides with the same number.
 
i jus thought tht it wud be a little bit more complicated, but thnx all the same, jus needed to make sure i was on the right track.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top