Finding Ka using a Galvanic cell and Electric Potential

AI Thread Summary
To determine the acid dissociation constant (Ka) for a monoprotic weak acid using a galvanic cell, the setup includes weighing 2.28 g of the acid and 1.96 g of its sodium salt, then dissolving them in water with quinhydrone. The standard reduction potential for the aluminum half-cell is -1.67 V, and the measured cell potential is 2.20 V. The concentrations of the acid and its salt can be calculated using their molar masses, leading to the use of the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation to relate [H+] to Ka. The discussion emphasizes the need to calculate the concentrations accurately and how to incorporate the electric potential into the calculations for Ka. Understanding the roles of the half-cells and the relationship between the components is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
Castiel
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose you wish to determine Ka for a monoprotic weak acid of molecular mass 76.11 g/mol. The pH meter you need to use is not working. You decide to weigh out 2.28 g of the acid and 1.96 of its sodium salt and dissolve them together in water, add quinhydrone and set up a half-cell with Pt wire just as you did in this experiment. Unfortunately, the only other wire you can find is aluminum. Therefore, you prepare a .1 M solution of aluminum sulfate, create an Al3+/Al half-cell and set up a galvanic cell with the quinhydrone electrode. The standard reduction potential for the aluminum couple is -1.67 V. When you measure the cell potential, you find it to be 2.20V. From this information, calculate Ka for the weak acid.

Homework Equations


Ecell=Estd-(0.0257/n)*ln(Ka) ?
2.20v=(-1.67v+E quinhydrone cell)-(0.0257/3)*ln(Ka)

Al3+ + 3e- → Al (s) Eo=-1.67v
quinone+ 2H+ +2e- → hydroquinone ?

The Attempt at a Solution


For the E of the quinhydrone cell, would I be able to use this (given earlier in the lab)?

quinone+ 2H+ +2e- → hydroquinone Eo=.70v

And I have no idea what to do with the grams or the molar mass. All I can think of is that you could convert it into moles and somehow find the molarity from that? Assuming it's one liter? But can you do that? Can you just assume it's one liter?

And what is the "1.96 g of its sodium salt" mean? is that the aluminum sulfate?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Sodium salt of the acid. Your solution contains both acid and its salt - something like mixture of acetic acid and sodium acetate. Think in terms of Henderson-Hasselbalch equation.

Nice question.
 
Hmmm so I'd use this equation?

[H+]=Ka [HA]/[A-] ?
Then to find the concentrations, could I just do...
(2.28g H+) X (1 mol/76.11 g) = .02996 mol H+ and for one liter-----> [H+]=0.02996 and
(1.96g A-) X (1 mol/76.11 g) = .02575 mol A- and so [A-]=0.02575

meaning...
0.02996=Ka [HA]/.02575 ?
But how do I find HA? I'm assuming it has something to do with the electric potential...would I use .70 for my volts for the acid half cell?
Then I know the concentration of the aluminum sulfate...and I have the acid and base concentrations...so I could just plug those into the Ecell equation and solve for [HA] then plug that into the [H+]=Ka [HA]\[A-] equation and solve for Ka?

Another question. Would the aluminum half cell be the cathode?
 
IMHO you are expected to use potential to find pH, HA and A- are known - you are told what masses were dissolved, so you can calculate molarities.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top