Finding Lagrangian: General Procedure?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ShayanJ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lagrangian
AI Thread Summary
The Lagrangian in mechanics is initially defined as L = T - V, where T is kinetic energy and V is potential energy. However, for forces like electromagnetism, this formula does not apply since these forces cannot be described by a single potential field. Instead, the Lagrangian for electromagnetic forces is considered fundamental and can be derived from the Lorentz force expression by reformulating it in terms of scalar and vector potentials. Other situations where L = T - V may not apply include forces that are not simply the gradient of a potential, particularly in relativistic contexts. Overall, while L = T - V is generally applicable in classical mechanics, exceptions arise in electromagnetism and potentially in Quantum Field Theory.
ShayanJ
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
2,801
Reaction score
606
In texts about Lagrangian mechanics,at first Lagrangian is defined as below:
L=T-V
T and V being kinetic and potential energy respectively
But when you proceed,they say that for some forces like magnetic forces Lagrangian is as such and can't be obtained by the above formula but it doesn't say how it obtains the Lagrangian for a particle subjected to magnetic forces.
I want to know is there a general procedure for finding the Lagrangian?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Shyan said:
In texts about Lagrangian mechanics,at first Lagrangian is defined as below:
L=T-V
T and V being kinetic and potential energy respectively
But when you proceed,they say that for some forces like magnetic forces Lagrangian is as such and can't be obtained by the above formula but it doesn't say how it obtains the Lagrangian for a particle subjected to magnetic forces.
I want to know is there a general procedure for finding the Lagrangian?
Thanks

The Lagrangian for the electromagnetic force is I think just a fundamental law of physics, you can't derive it from anything more fundamental. Just like in the Newtonian way of doing mechanics you take Newton's law of gravity or the Lorentz force on a charged particle as fundamental, you take the Lagrangian for these forces as fundamental in Lagrangian mechanics. The L = T - V formula just gives you a quick way of going from forces that are described by a simple potential (V) in Newtonian mechanics to Lagrangian mechanics. The electromagnetic force is not describable by a single potential field so that formula doesn't work.

However, although you can't really derive the electromagnetic lagrangian from anything more fundamental, you can show that it is the lagrangian you need in order to reproduce the same results that you get in the Newtonian description of electromagnetism. Starting with the Lorentz force expression, you can derive the electromagnetic lagrangian, which is sort of deriving it from something equally fundamental rather than more fundamental. To do that just fiddle with the lorentz force expression by first writing it in terms of the scalar and vector potentials rather than E and B fields and then try and arrange it into a form that is the same as Lagrange's equations of motion and look at what the Lagrangian is.
 
Thanks
But what about other situations where we can't use L=T-V?(Are there any?)
 
Shyan said:
Thanks
But what about other situations where we can't use L=T-V?(Are there any?)

Well it would just be any situation where the force isn't just simply the gradient of some potential. I can't think of a simple example other than electromagnetism. But actually any force that can be described with a single potential will not be compatible with relativity, so once relativity becomes important no Lagrangians will be of the form T - V. In Quantum Field Theory for example I expect that formula becomes pretty redundant, but I don't know any Quantum Field Theory. In classical mechanics I think the T - V will basically always work unless you're dealing with electromagnetism, I'm not an expert though.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...

Similar threads

Back
Top