Finding length of an arc produced by projectile

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving a formula for the arc length of a projectile's path, with the user expressing difficulty in calculus. They attempted to find y as a function of x and apply the arc length formula but ended up with a complicated result. Participants suggest that the arc length question is best framed as a math problem rather than a physics one. It is noted that while the arc length of a parabola can be complex, it is still solvable using the appropriate formula. The user is encouraged to share their work for more targeted assistance.
sk0071
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
So I decided to try deriving a general formula for fun. Being a high school student, the calculus got scary very fast. At this point, I'm just curious as to what the best approach to this might be. The approach I used was finding y as a function of x and then inputting it into the arc length formula. I eventually derived a very complicated formula that I think is wrong. I don't know very much about calculus as everything I've learned about it I've learned through the internet. Would this approach work? Is there a better way? If so what is the correct formula?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should post what you've done as homework. It's not possible to help without seeing what you've done.
 
Arc length question is best posed as a math question - not physics.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top