Finding Sound Velocity in Iron: Examining Dispersion Curves

AI Thread Summary
To find the sound velocity in iron, examining dispersion curves is a viable approach, specifically through the group propagation velocity calculated as vg = dw/dk. The discussion highlights that for audio frequencies, dispersion effects are minimal, making it sufficient to reference established values from tables. Clarification on the purpose of obtaining sound velocity in iron is also sought, indicating potential applications. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the context and frequency range when determining sound velocity in materials like iron.
rubertoda
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
I want to define (and find the sound velocity i iron).

can i read it through the dispersion curves of iron?

I am trying to see it through the group propagation velocity, vg = dw/dk, i. e the slope
of the dispersion relation w(k).

am i on the right track?





thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am not sure what are you trying to do.
For what purpose do you need the speed of sound in iron?
For audio frequencies the dispersion is negligible and you can just look up the speed on a table.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Back
Top