Finding the Angle When the Crate Begins to Slip

  • Thread starter Thread starter Graydon Hope
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle Slip
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the angle at which a crate begins to slip on an inclined board with a static friction coefficient of 0.29. Participants clarify that gravitational acceleration (g) can be canceled out in the equations, leading to the relationship μ < tan(θ). The process involves substituting μ with 0.29 and using the inverse tangent to find the angle θ. There are also issues regarding the readability of an accompanying image, with some users able to view it clearly while others struggle. Overall, the thread provides insights into solving the physics problem and addresses technical difficulties with visual aids.
Graydon Hope
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A crate is placed on an adjustable, inclined board. The coefficient of static friction between the crate and the board is 0.29. A) Calculate the angle at which the crate just begins to slip.

Homework Equations


Sum of Forces=M*A

The Attempt at a Solution


In my problem: Why is g cancelled? and why is 0.29 added to tan^-1
These are highlighted areas
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20170525_213308.jpg
    IMG_20170525_213308.jpg
    22.1 KB · Views: 716
Physics news on Phys.org
Your picture is so tiny it is not readable
 
Hmm weird.. I can see it clearly even from my phone. Its my first post maybe I messed something up.
 
phinds said:
Your picture is so tiny it is not readable
Weird.. I can see it from my phone clearly. Maybe I did something wrong
 
so it looks like you have in the one section: = 0 < g*(sinθ - μ*cosθ). Just multiply both sides by 1/g and you have 0/g < (g/g)*(sinθ - μ*cosθ). 0/g is 0, and g/g is 1.
For the last part, they get it down to μ < tanθ, then plug in μ=0.29 which is given in the problem statement. Take inverse tangent of both sides to find θ.
 
When I was young, I had excellent near vision. Now . . . not so much. However, even when I downloaded the photo and zoomed in, I can still see well enough to realize there is a shortage of pixels; it is still very difficult to read. "And things that are too hard just aren't worth doing," said someone.

Welcome to Physics Forums.
 
  • Like
Likes scottdave
TomHart said:
even when I downloaded the photo and zoomed in, I can still see well enough to realize there is a shortage of pixels; it is still very difficult to read.
Strange.. if I click on the link it takes me to https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/img_20170525_213308-jpg.204257/, an image that is quite readable even with my so-so vision. (But it is so misaligned to the frame that the top right corner is missing.)
Anyway, scottdave has posted the answers to the OP questions.
 
Back
Top