Finding the Area of ABMN: A Geometry Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter fork
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Geometry
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the area of the quadrilateral ABMN within a rectangle ABCD, where M is the midpoint of BC and N is the intersection of lines AC and MD. Participants suggest calculating the areas of triangles MCB and ABC using the lengths of AB and BC, labeling them as x and y for clarity. The challenge lies in determining the height of triangle MNC, which can be approached by establishing a coordinate system and solving linear equations for the intersecting lines. The final area ratio mentioned is 2:5, indicating a specific relationship in the areas involved. The conversation briefly diverges into unrelated topics, but the primary focus remains on solving the geometry problem.
fork
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
In the figure, ABCD is a rectangle. M is the midpoint of BC and AC intersects MD at N.
Find the Area of the NCD: Area of ABMN.

I am sorry i don't know how to solve this question. Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • Maths.JPG
    Maths.JPG
    5.5 KB · Views: 402
Physics news on Phys.org
Well you can find areas of MCB and ABC easy enough in terms of lengths AB and BC (I'm assuming your answer neads to be in terms of AB and BC-so I would label them x and y to make it easier) Then the only trick would be finding the area of MNC, you can find the base easy enough the height is the tricky part. Once you know the area of MNC finding NCB and ABMN should be simple.

As far as finding the height of MNC I might try creating a coordinate system for the figure then finding linear equations for the lines AC and MD then solving the two equations simultaneously to find their point of intersection.
 
In fact, the ans is 2:5. And I can calculate this question by using your method. Thank.
 
Your welcome. And that's true for any rectangle? How interesting.
 
tamalkuila said:
prove that primes of the form 4n+1 are infinite?send the proof to tamalkuila@gmail.com
What does this have to do with the original question?

The Bob (2004 ©)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top