Finding the basis for a set of vectors.

  • Thread starter Thread starter kingkong69
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Basis Set Vectors
kingkong69
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
The set is (1,3),(-1,2),(7,6)
it is in R2 so I don't get why there are 3 elements.
I assumed they are not vectors but points instead.


but if they are points then it becomes a line, and the answer is that its dimension is 2, and a basis is (1,0) and (0,1)

Could someone explain this?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kingkong69 said:
The set is (1,3),(-1,2),(7,6)
it is in R2 so I don't get why there are 3 elements.
I assumed they are not vectors but points instead.


but if they are points then it becomes a line, and the answer is that its dimension is 2, and a basis is (1,0) and (0,1)

Could someone explain this?
Thanks


The question isn't clear: perhaps they meant to ask you to form a basis for \mathbb R^2 out of the three given vectors? If so the

answer is pretty simple: any two different vectors from your set of 3 forms a basis of that vector space, as none of them is

a scalar multiple of another one. Period

What you say about "points" and "vectors" and "lines" is odd, to say the least, and I can't tell what you actually meant.

DonAntonio
 
I strongly recommend you go back and read the problem again. You say titled this "Finding the basis for a set of vectors" which makes no sense. A general set of vectors does not have a basis! A vector space has a basis.

I suspect that the problem really says "find a subset of these vectors that form as basis for R^2". Since R2 has dimension 2, as you say, a basis cannot have fewer than 2 vectors and giving you only two vectors would make the problem trivial- either just the 2 given vectors was a basis (if they are independent) or they are not. But if you are given three or more vectors, they cannot be independent. Any two independent vectors, chosen from those three, will be a basis for R2.
 
Thread 'Determine whether ##125## is a unit in ##\mathbb{Z_471}##'
This is the question, I understand the concept, in ##\mathbb{Z_n}## an element is a is a unit if and only if gcd( a,n) =1. My understanding of backwards substitution, ... i have using Euclidean algorithm, ##471 = 3⋅121 + 108## ##121 = 1⋅108 + 13## ##108 =8⋅13+4## ##13=3⋅4+1## ##4=4⋅1+0## using back-substitution, ##1=13-3⋅4## ##=(121-1⋅108)-3(108-8⋅13)## ... ##= 121-(471-3⋅121)-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24(471-3⋅121## ##=121-471+3⋅121-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24⋅471+72⋅121##...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
Back
Top