Finding the charge when three charges are in equilibrium

AI Thread Summary
To find the charge q1 that allows charge q2 to be in static equilibrium, the forces acting on q2 must be balanced. The relevant force equation is F = k(q1q2)/r², where r is the distance between the charges. The correct approach involves equating the forces between q2 and the other two charges, Q and q1. It is essential to set up two independent equations to solve for the unknowns, as both q1 and q2 are variables in this scenario. Properly analyzing the forces acting on q2 will lead to the solution for q1 without needing the specific value of q2.
johnsch3
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
q1___________Q___________q2
10cm 10cm

In the figure above the charge in the middle is Q=-3.1nC. For what charge q1 will charge q2 be in static equilibrium?

Relevant equations
I think that F=kq1q2/r^2 is relevant



my attempt at a solution
Since the ions are in equilibrium I assumed that F=0. so F2onQ=F1onQ=0
thus kQq2/r^2=kQq1/r^2
so [(9x10^9)(3.1x10^-9C)(q2)]/.1^2=[(9x10^9)(3.1x10^-9C)(q1)]/.1^2

but I'm not quite sure where to go from here or if I'm even going in the right direction. Please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're close with setting the two forces equal, but they aren't quite the correct forces to use. You want q2 to be in equilibrium, which means the forces you're going to be dealing with are those that act on q2. So that will be the force between Q and q2 and between q1 and q2. If you set up the force equations for those two pairs and then equate them, you should be able to solve for q1.
 
okay, I re-set up the equations to look like
[(9x10^9)(3.1x10^-9)(q2)]/.1^2=(9x10^9)(q1)(q2)/.2^2

And I know that I have to solve for q1, but I don't understand how I am supposed to do that without the value for q2. How do I solve for q2 or is there something I'm not seeing where I don't have to know it?
 
1) symbols man, they make things look so much prettier =]

2) whenever I have 2 unknowns I have to solve for, I always like to have 2 linearly independent equations. Makes things much easier, I've found.
 
Let me try to summarize what I think you've said so far, and maybe you'll see what's going on with this.

## F = K \frac{q_1q_2}{r^2}## is a relevant equation.

The charges are in equilibrium so we can say ##\Sigma F = 0##

That being in mind ##\Sigma F_{\text{ net on Q!}} = K \frac{Qq_1}{r^2} + K \frac{Qq_2}{r^2}##

[See anything yet?]

Now for some questions. How many forces act on each charge?
Therefore, how many forces should you have in the summation for each charge?

I'm trying to drop some hints without giving it away :smile:

P.S.
Can someone msg me and let me know why putting color tags in the middle of an equation makes the itex crap it's pants? I want to highlight certain elements i.e. subscripts but I can't... WTF ITEX
 
Try drawing and labeling the forces on q2.

Then set up your equation based on those forces, charges and distances.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top