Find Curl of B: Electric & Mag Fields in Plane Wave

  • Thread starter Thread starter adichy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curl
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the curl of the magnetic field B in a plane wave propagating in the z-direction, represented in complex-exponential notation. The user is confused about obtaining a zero result when differentiating B, as they assumed B only has a z-component. However, it is clarified that the magnetic field should have components in the x and y directions, leading to non-zero contributions in the curl calculation. The importance of understanding the orthogonal nature of electric and magnetic fields in wave propagation is emphasized. Proper application of the curl definition is necessary to resolve the user's confusion.
adichy
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The electric and magnetic fields in a plane wave propagating in free-space in the z-direction can we represented by (in complex-exponential notation)

E(x, y, z, t) = E_0 e^i(kz−wt+d ) and B(x, y, z, t) = B_0e^i(kz−wt+d )

Starting with the Ampère-Maxwell law, ∇ x B =μ_0 ε_0 dE/dt , show that E_0 = −c(z×B0).

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I'm only having problems when I do curl B (differentiating E is no problem). I'm using the matrix method, but by just looking, it seems like it should be zero since B is in the z direction and there's no field in the x or y direction i.e

x_______y________z

d/dx___d/dy_____d/dz

0_______0____B_0e^i(kz−wt+d )

I should be getting something like ike^(...), but I'm not. Any insight would be helpful

Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
While B is in the z direction only, the curl B will have components in the x and y directions and not the z direction. So you should review the curl definition again and see where you went astray.
 
The wave is propagating in the z-direction. The magnetic field doesn't point in the z-direction.
 
Sorry, what I meant was from doing the calculation, I found the answer to be zero. That's what I found confusing. It shouldn't be zero.

Am I assuming wrong that d/dx and d/dy of B will come out as 0 since it's differentiating constants as there are no x or y variables in the field?

Basically, this is what I got from doing curl B:

x_hat[d/dy e^(...) - d/dz (0)] -y_hat[d/dx e^(...) - d/dz(0)] + z_hat[0-0]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
vela said:
The wave is propagating in the z-direction. The magnetic field doesn't point in the z-direction.

Ahh, of course, they're supposed to be orthogonal. I was under the impression that the magnetic field was in the z direction.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top