Finding the formula of a projection in M2x2 (R)

In summary, we can find the matrix representation of T by using the formula for a projection and plugging in the standard basis of M2x2(ℝ). This results in a zero matrix, indicating that T maps all inputs to the zero matrix, as U is the kernel of T.I hope this helps to clarify the problem and guide you in finding the solution. Good luck!
  • #1
benlinus
1
0

Homework Statement



Let T : M2x2(ℝ) → M2x2(ℝ) denote the projection on W along U.

W={
[a b]
[c d] : a+b+c+d=0 }

U= span{ I2 }

Find the matrix representation of T with respect to the standard basis of M2x2(ℝ) and the formula for T.

Homework Equations



From my notes, I know W is the range of T and U is the kernel of T.

M2x2(ℝ) = W [itex]\oplus[/itex] U (Direct sum)

The Attempt at a Solution



I am unsure how to proceed. Any thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2




Thank you for your question. I would approach this problem by first understanding the definitions of range and kernel, as well as the concept of a projection.

The range of a linear transformation T is the set of all possible outputs that T can produce. In this case, we are given that W is the range of T. This means that any matrix in W can be obtained as the output of T.

The kernel of T, also known as the null space, is the set of all inputs that produce a zero output. In this case, we are given that U is the kernel of T. This means that any matrix in U will result in a zero output when fed into T.

Next, we can use the formula for a projection to find the matrix representation of T. The formula for a projection is P = A(A^T A)^-1 A^T, where A is the matrix representation of the transformation. In this case, we can let A be the standard basis of M2x2(ℝ), which is given by the matrices [1 0], [0 1], [0 0], [0 0].

We can now plug in the values for A to get the matrix representation of T:

P = [1 0 0 0]([1 0 0 0]^T [1 0 0 0] [1 0 0 0]^T)^-1 [1 0 0 0]^T
[0 1 0 0]([0 1 0 0]^T [0 1 0 0] [0 1 0 0]^T)^-1 [0 1 0 0]^T
[0 0 1 0]([0 0 1 0]^T [0 0 1 0] [0 0 1 0]^T)^-1 [0 0 1 0]^T
[0 0 0 1]([0 0 0 1]^T [0 0 0 1] [0 0 0 1]^T)^-1 [0 0 0 1]^T

Simplifying this expression, we get the matrix representation of T as:

T = [0 0 0 0
 

FAQ: Finding the formula of a projection in M2x2 (R)

1. What is the formula for finding the projection of a 2x2 matrix in R?

The formula for finding the projection of a 2x2 matrix in R is P = A(ATA)-1AT, where P is the projection matrix and A is the original 2x2 matrix.

2. How is the formula for finding the projection of a 2x2 matrix derived?

The formula for finding the projection of a 2x2 matrix is derived from the orthogonal projection theorem, which states that the projection of a vector onto a subspace can be calculated by multiplying the vector by the projection matrix. The projection matrix is derived using the Gram-Schmidt process, which is a method for finding an orthonormal basis for a subspace.

3. Can the projection formula be applied to matrices of different sizes or in different fields?

The projection formula can be applied to matrices of different sizes as long as they are square matrices. It can also be applied in different fields as long as the matrix operations are defined in that field, such as complex numbers or quaternions.

4. How does the projection formula help in understanding linear transformations?

The projection formula helps in understanding linear transformations by providing a way to calculate the projection of a vector onto a subspace, which is an important concept in linear algebra. It also shows the relationship between the original matrix and its projection, which can give insights into the behavior of linear transformations.

5. Can the projection formula be extended to higher dimensions?

Yes, the projection formula can be extended to higher dimensions. In general, the projection of a vector onto a subspace of dimension n can be calculated using the formula P = A(ATA)-1AT, where A is a matrix of size m x n, where m is the dimension of the vector space. However, the projection formula for higher dimensions can become more complex and may require additional techniques such as eigenvalues and eigenvectors.

Similar threads

Back
Top