Finding the Function Represented by a Power Series

popo902
Messages
59
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Determine the an so that the equation
\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}{na_{n}x^{n-1}} + 2\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}{a_{n}x^{n}} = 0<br />


is satisfied. Try to identify the function represented by the series
\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}{a_{n}x^{n}} = 0<br />


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution




what i have so far is

\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}x^{n}[{a_{n+1}(n+1) + 2a_{n}}]= 0<br />

i just combined the series.
then i solved for a,n

an = -1/2(an+1)(n+1)

so...is this right?
if it is, where do i go from here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would write it as a_{n+1}=(-2/(n+1))*a_{n}. But sure, that's ok. To identify the function I'd notice that one of those sums looks like the derivative of the other sum. Try and write a differential equation for
<br /> f(x)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}{a_{n}x^{n}}<br />
 
Last edited:
Or alternatively, you can use the original given equation to find a_0, then derive a formula for a_n from that. It sounds like that's what they want. The differential equation method mentioned by Dick, however, is much quicker if you are allowed that.
 
i noticed from the first equation that the left sum, was the deriv. of the right, ecxept that the 2 was in front
so technically it would look like this : y' + 2y = 0, when y = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}{a_{n}x^{n}} = 0<br />

so are you saying i should just solve the normal DE and i'll get the solution that resembles that summation...?


"I would write it as a_{n+1}=(-2/(n+1))*a_{n}."
i see now that this way was better since you need a0 to find the rest
...but then i thought i was solving for an?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top