Finding the integral of x^a using a geometric progression

  • Thread starter Thread starter courtrigrad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geometric Integral
AI Thread Summary
To find the integral of x^a using a geometric progression, the function can be expressed as y = x^a, representing a geometric series with a first term of 1 and a common ratio of x. The integral can be calculated using the formula for the sum of a geometric series, leading to the expression ∫^b_a x^a dx = lim (n → ∞) Σ (b-a)^(i+1)/(i+1). This approach is particularly useful for integrals that are challenging to solve with conventional methods. However, it is noted that this method may not apply if a = -1. Overall, this technique offers a valuable alternative for certain integration problems.
courtrigrad
Messages
1,236
Reaction score
2
Let's say y = x^a and you want to find \int^b_a x^a

How would you find this using a geometric progression?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1.U forgot "dx" in the integral...
2.I'm sure u cannot use geometric progression,if a=-1
3.Do u know how to work with Riemann sums?

Daniel.
 
for sharing this method for finding the integral of x^a using a geometric progression. To find the integral using this method, we can first rewrite the function as y = x^a, which means that y is the sum of a geometric progression with first term 1 and common ratio x.

Next, we can use the formula for the sum of a geometric progression to find the integral:

\int^b_a x^a dx = \lim_{n \to \infty} \sum_{i=0}^{n} \frac{(b-a)^{i+1}}{i+1}

This formula can be derived by using the fact that the sum of a geometric progression with first term a and common ratio r is given by \frac{a(1-r^n)}{1-r}.

Substituting in our values of a=1 and r=x, we get the formula above.

By taking the limit as n approaches infinity, we can find the exact value of the integral. This method can be useful for finding integrals of functions that cannot be easily integrated using traditional methods.

Thanks again for sharing this approach, it can be a valuable tool for solving certain integration problems.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
792
Replies
3
Views
700
Replies
5
Views
944
Replies
3
Views
707
Replies
7
Views
556
Replies
2
Views
658
Back
Top