Finding the Location of the 2nd Antinode in a Standing Wave at 4.10 Meters

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the location of the 2nd antinode in a standing wave, given that the 4th node is at 4.10 meters. The calculations initially suggest that the wavelength is 2.05 meters, leading to an incorrect position for the 2nd antinode at approximately 2.56 meters. Participants express confusion over the application of the equations for nodes and antinodes, particularly regarding the correct interpretation of the standing wave's characteristics. There is also uncertainty about the type of medium the standing wave is in, whether it is a string or a pipe, which could affect the calculations. Clarification on these aspects is necessary to resolve the issue effectively.
jamcintyre1
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The 4th node of a standing wave occurs at a position of 4.10 meters. Where is the 2nd antinode?

Homework Equations



nodes occur at: x=n*(λ/2)
antinodes: x=(n+.5)*(λ/2)

The Attempt at a Solution


n=4??
4.1m=2λ→λ=2.05m
now n=2? x=(2+.5)*(λ/2)≈2.56m wrong!
x=1.54m
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jamcintyre1 said:

Homework Statement



The 4th node of a standing wave occurs at a position of 4.10 meters. Where is the 2nd antinode?

Homework Equations



nodes occur at: x=n*(λ/2)
antinodes: x=(n+.5)*(λ/2)

The Attempt at a Solution


n=4??
4.1m=2λ→λ=2.05m
now n=2? x=(2+.5)*(λ/2)≈2.56m wrong!
x=1.54m

No answer to that question as it stands.

Was there any particular feature of the standing wave at position 0.00 metres?
 
I didn't get any more info. the solution has a sin graph I think with the 2nd antinode as the 2nd max which mazes sense, so 1.5*wavelength/2. But I can't figure out why the equation won't work. Thanks for your help btw. I'll take a look at you question.
 
jamcintyre1 said:
I didn't get any more info. the solution has a sin graph I think with the 2nd antinode as the 2nd max which mazes sense, so 1.5*wavelength/2. But I can't figure out why the equation won't work. Thanks for your help btw. I'll take a look at you question.

This standing wave ..

Is it on a string, fixed at one end at 0.00

Is the standing wave in an open pipe? An open pipe that runs form 0.00m to some distant point?

Is this standing wave in a stopped pipe? A stopped pipe with its stopped end at 0.00?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Back
Top