Finding the Longest Wavelength of Standing Waves on a 254.0 cm String

AI Thread Summary
The longest wavelength for standing waves on a 254.0 cm string fixed at both ends is determined by the fundamental frequency, where the string vibrates in one segment. The wavelength is calculated using the formula λ = 2L/n, where L is the length of the string and n is the mode number. For the fundamental mode (n=1), the longest wavelength equals twice the length of the string, resulting in a wavelength of 508.0 cm. The fixed ends of the string create boundary conditions that restrict the possible wavelengths, allowing only certain harmonics to form. Understanding these principles is essential for analyzing wave behavior in strings.
kathyt.25
Messages
49
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


What is the longest wavelength for standing waves on a 254.0 cm long string that is fixed at both ends?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


When x = L (length of string):

k(n) = n*pi / L
wavelength (n) = n*pi / k(n)

I got the answer, I just don't understand why these equations are used in my textbook to find this particular answer.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
"how can a wave be made?"

Imagine pulling on the rope hard, to make it taut. You could then make the rope vibrate like a guitar string.

A wave has to be set up in the rope to make it vibrate. Obviously, the fixed ends can't be vibrating, which sets restrictions on the permitted wavelengths. So: what's the longest possible wavelength?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top