Finding the Mass of a Puck in a 2-Dimensional Collision

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem involving a 2-dimensional collision between two pucks. Puck A has a known mass and velocities, while puck B's mass is unknown. The initial calculations using momentum conservation did not yield the correct answer, which is 0.22 kg according to the textbook. A participant identified a mistake in measuring the angle for puck A, which was incorrectly noted as 54 degrees instead of 45 degrees. With the corrected angle, the problem aligns with the textbook solution, confirming the importance of accurate angle measurement in collision problems.
SwAnK
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
having trouble with this problem in my textbook

two pucks collide, puck A has a mass of 0.32kg, and an initial velocity of 0.04 m/s [54 N of E], and a final velocity of 0.034 m/s [N]
puck B's mass is unknown but has an initial velocity of 0.038 m/s [S of W] and a final velocity of 0.028 m/s [46.5 N of E]. Puck B's mass needs to be found.

Wheni tried it i used components but i did not get the right answer, the answer in the back of the book is 0.22kg. Does anyone else get this answer? if so could you explain how?? thanx.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
what equations did you use...i'm assuming pure elastic?
 
yeah i assumed that it was pure elastic, the equation used was..

(m1x)(v1x) +(m2x)(v2x) = (m1x)(v1fx) +(m2x)(v2fx)

(m1y)(v1y) +(m2y)(v2y) = (m1y)(v1fy) +(m2y)(v2fy)
 
Could you show me your complete procedure?
 
try using the conservation of Energy rather than momentum...cuz with teh Cons of Mom...it'd be best if you showed those angles...sorry lazy to draw it out myself.
 
bah! sorry for wasting your time, i measured the one angle wrong it was 45 instead of 54! thanks for your time though, with that change the problem does work out to the solution in the back.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top