Finding the max range of a jump on the moon using kinematics

AI Thread Summary
To determine the maximum jump range on the Moon, the initial jump speed on Earth was calculated to be approximately 6.26 m/s. Using this speed and the Moon's lower gravity of 1.6 m/s², the maximum jump distance was found to be about 24.03 m. The discussion highlighted that the range is inversely proportional to the gravitational acceleration, illustrating that as gravity decreases, the jump distance increases significantly. This relationship simplifies calculations, avoiding complex arithmetic. Overall, the findings emphasize the impact of reduced gravity on jump distances in different celestial environments.
garcia1
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A person can jump a maximum horizontal
distance (by using a 45 ◦
projectile angle) of
4 m on Earth.
The acceleration of gravity is 9.8 m/s
2
.
What would be his maximum range on the
Moon, where the free-fall acceleration is g
6 ?
Answer in units of m.



Homework Equations



Kinematics equations

The Attempt at a Solution



All I can think to do is set kinematics equations for the x and y-axis equal to each other by another variable, such as time. This is as far as I can figure out with this problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi garcia1! :smile:

(have a degree: ° and try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)

from the first part, find the speed at which this person can jump

then use that speed with the Moon's g to find how far he will jump on the Moon …

what do you get? :smile:
 
24.0304m/s, by using the fact that vf = 0, and then solving for VoY and getting 6.26m/s. I then plugged this into:

Y = Vy^2 - VoY^2 / (2*-9.81m/s^2 / 6) = 12.01518

Multiplying by two because I used Vf = 0 at the top of the jump, I got 24.0304m. It was right!
 
:biggrin: Woohoo! :biggrin:

ok, now have you noticed that the range is inversely proportional to the gravity (24/4 = 6)?

can you prove that, and so avoid all the tedious arithmetic? :wink:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top