Finding the Maximum Compression Distance of a Spring: A Physics Problem

AI Thread Summary
To find the maximum compression distance of a spring when a 2kg block is dropped from 40 cm, the correct approach involves using energy conservation principles. The gravitational potential energy (mgh) must equal the elastic potential energy stored in the spring (1/2 k x^2). Initial calculations using the force equation led to incorrect results, indicating a misunderstanding of the energy transfer involved. The correct maximum compression of the spring is 10 cm, which suggests that the block would need to be dropped from a height of 50 cm to achieve this compression. The discussion emphasizes the importance of using the right method and understanding the relationship between gravitational and spring potential energy.
roam
Messages
1,265
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement


A 2kg block is dropped from a height of 40 cm onto a spring of force constant k=1960 N/m. Find the maximum distance the spring is compressed.

(The answer must be 10 cm)

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, I know that if a spring is stretched "y", it will be compressed "y". The problem is that I can't find out how long will the spring stretch once it is dropped from that height. Therefore I tried to use the formula

F = ky

Where F= mg = 2 \times 9.81 and k =1960 N/m which is 196000 N/cm

2 \times 9.81 = (196000) k

y= \frac{2 \times 9.81}{196000}

But this gives me the wrong answer. Why is that?? :confused:

By the way, I know that the tension is T= 2 \pi \sqrt{\frac{m}{k}} = 2 \pi \sqrt{\frac{2}{196000}}= 0.02 N.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is best to consider energy for this problem, graviational pe = potential pe of springAlso that T is period time and not the tension.
 
rock.freak667 said:
It is best to consider energy for this problem, graviational pe = potential pe of spring

I tried that, it doesn't seem to work:

mgh= \frac{1}{2} k x^2

2 (9.81) 40 = 1/2 (196000) x2

x=0.089 cm

Because the correct answer should be 10 cm! Is there anything wrong with my calculations?

Also that T is period time and not the tension.

Yep, my mistake. :blushing:
 
Not sure, the only way to get 10cm exact is if the mass was dropped from 50cm.

Normally, the energy method should work.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top