How Do You Calculate the Moment of Inertia for Combined Square Laminas?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the moment of inertia for the combined square laminas, the problem involves two laminas: ABCD with mass 5m and PQRS with mass m. The axis of rotation is a horizontal line through point K, which is crucial for determining the moment of inertia. Using the perpendicular axes theorem, the moment of inertia for ABCD is calculated as 10ma²/3, while for PQRS it is ma²/3. The total moment of inertia is then derived as 11ma²/3, but the solution notes indicate it should be 40ma²/3, suggesting a need for clarification on the axis of rotation.
hms.tech
Messages
246
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two uniform square laminas are combined into a single body. One lamina ABCD has mass 5m and the other lamina PQRS has mass m. The lamina PQRS has side 2a, and its vertices are at the mid-points of the sides of ABCD, with P on AB and S on AD. The line PS meets AC at K, and the body rotates in a vertical plane about a horizontal axis k through K (see diagram). Find the moment of inertia of the body about k.

Homework Equations



parallel and the perpendicular axes theorems

The Attempt at a Solution



If i understand the question correctly, is the "dashed"(broken)line, the axis about which we need to find the moment of inertia ? If that is the case, here is what i did :Using the perpendicular axes theorem : (let I_{A} be the moment of inertia about the required axis for ABCD only)
2I_{A} = \frac{5m(2a^{2}+2a^{2})}{3}
I_{A} = \frac{10ma^{2}}{3}

Similarly, let I_{B} be the moment of inertia about the required axis for PQRS only :
Using the perpendicular axes theorem,
I_{B} = \frac{ma^{2}}{3}

The total moment of inertia = I_{A} + I_{B}
Total = \frac{11ma^{2}}{3}

The problem is that the solution notes state the answer to be \frac{40ma^{2}}{3}
 

Attachments

  • Capture.PNG
    Capture.PNG
    3.6 KB · Views: 563
Physics news on Phys.org
Since k was not indicated on the diagram it's a bit of a puzzle all right as to what the axis of rotation is. It's supposed to be a "horizontal" axis which would seem to eliminate the dashed line though. I think the intended axis is a "hozizontal" line passing thru point K. In other words, the axis of rotation is parallel to line AB, and also to a line drawn thru SQ, and situated inbetween those two and passing thru point K.

Happy integration!
 
I would interpret rotating "in a ... plane" as meaning the axis is perpendicular to the lamina.
 
haruspex said:
I would interpret rotating "in a ... plane" as meaning the axis is perpendicular to the lamina.

That sounds sound. I agree.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top