Finding the Position and Charge for a Zero Resultant Force in Coulomb's Law

AI Thread Summary
To achieve a zero resultant force on a third charge placed between two positive charges (q1=16.0mC at x=2.00m and q2=9.00mC at the origin), the third charge must be negative. The distance from the origin to this charge is critical for balancing the forces exerted by the two positive charges. Calculations suggest that the charge should be placed approximately 86 cm from the origin to satisfy the condition of equal forces acting on it. The importance of proper algebraic manipulation in solving the equations for force balance is emphasized. The discussion highlights the necessity of placing the charge correctly and ensuring its negative sign to achieve equilibrium.
EvanQ
Messages
56
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Three point charges lie along the x axis. A positive charge q1=16.0mC is at x=2.00m. Another positive charge q2=9.00mC is at the origin.

Where should we put a third charge so the resultant force acting on it is zero?

What should be the sign of the charge?

Homework Equations



F=k(Qq/(r^2))

k=9x10^9 (Nm^2)/(C^2)

The Attempt at a Solution




First of all, the charge must be -ve if there is going to be a net force of zero acting on it between the two positive charges.

Let the distance between the origin charge and the negative charge be x. Therefore the distance between q2 and the negative charge will be 2m - x.

The force between charges 1 and 3, and the force between charges 2 and 3 must be equal if there is to be no net charge, thus F13 = F23.

F13 = 9x10^9 ((Qx9uc)/(x^2))

F23 = 9x10^9 ((Qx16uc)/((2-x)^2))
= 9x10^9 ((Qx16uc)/(x^2 -4x+4)

((Qx16)/(x^2 -4x+4) = ((Qx9)/(x^2))

let Q = 1 for the sake of ratio's.

16/(-4x+4) = 9
4/(-x+1)=9
-x+1 = 0.44
x=0.555556

Therefore the 3rd charge should be places 55.5cm from the origin.

I feel like this is definitely wrong and my algebra is whacked up somewhere... can anyone help showing me where and how to rectify it? thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
EvanQ said:
((Qx16)/(x^2 -4x+4) = ((Qx9)/(x^2))

let Q = 1 for the sake of ratio's.

16/(-4x+4) = 9
4/(-x+1)=9
-x+1 = 0.44
x=0.555556

From ((Qx16)/(x^2 -4x+4) = ((Qx9)/(x^2)), you write 16/(-4x+4) = 9?

Cross-multiply and solve properly.

Does the charge have to be -ve?
 
alright got it now, thanks a lot for your help.

i was about 80% through typing out my reworking to see if you could check it when i accidentally clicked the back button on my mouse and lost it all, and i really can't put myself through typing it again lol.
 
EvanQ said:

Homework Statement



Three point charges lie along the x axis. A positive charge q1=16.0mC is at x=2.00m. Another positive charge q2=9.00mC is at the origin.

Where should we put a third charge so the resultant force acting on it is zero?.

I think your answer is wrong. Because q_{}2=9\muc is placed at the origin so q_{3} must be placed between q_{2} and q_{1} and if X is the distance that q_{3} is placed from the origin the answer will be " X=86cm ".Because kq_{}3q_{}2/x^{}2=kq_{}3q_{}1/(2-X)^{}2 and of course the charge must be minus
 
rado5 said:
... and of course the charge must be minus

You sound very confident. Think about it for a while.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top