Finding the Potential Between Two Coaxial Cylinders Using Laplace's Equation

cscott
Messages
778
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Two coaxial cylinders, radii {a,b} where b>a. Find the potential between the two cylinder surfaces.

Boundary conditions:
V(a,\phi) = 2 \cos \phi
V(b,\phi) = 12 \sin \phi

Homework Equations



Solution by separation of variables:
V(r,\phi) = a_0 + b_0 \ln s + \sum_k \left[ r^k(a_k \cos k\phi + b_k \sin k\phi)+r^{-k}(c_k\cos k\phi + d_k \sin k\phi)\right]

The Attempt at a Solution



I don't think I can eliminate the r^{-k} term because the origin isn't between the two cylinders.

I think k=1 is the only term in the summation that is required for the solution.

V(r,\phi) = r(a_1 \cos \phi + b_1 \sin \phi)+\frac{1}{r}(c_1\cos \phi + d_1 \sin \phi)

I don't see how to have the cosines vanish for V(b) and sines vanish for V(a) because of the common k in both.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You should actually write down the boundary conditions for k=1. There are nontrivial solutions.
 
I made a typo in my boundary conditions

Boundary conditions (in volts):
V(a,\phi) = 2 \cos \phi
V(b,\phi) = 12 \sin \phiTaking V(r,\phi)_{k=1} gives,
V(r,\phi) = r(a_1 \cos \phi + b_1 \sin \phi)+\frac{1}{r}(c_1\cos \phi + d_1 \sin \phi)

I will take a look at this...
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top