Finding the Resultant Force to Using Vector Components and Trigonometry

AI Thread Summary
To find the resultant force, resolve each vector into its x and y components. Add the x components to get Rx and the y components to get Ry. Use the Pythagorean theorem to calculate the magnitude of the resultant force with R = sqrt(Rx^2 + Ry^2). For direction, apply trigonometry using the formula tan(theta) = Ry/Rx. This method is essential when vectors are not collinear, as they cannot be simply added algebraically.
navarro714
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
What type of equation would I use to find the resultant force?

Do I just add the vectors together? Or change them to X and Y variable?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You could resolve each vector into x and y components, add the components and "unresolve" the 2 components back into a vector.
 
You can't just algebraically add them, since in general they have different directions. Split each vector into its x and y components, then add the x components together to get Rx, and add the y components together to get Ry, and use pythagorus to get the magnitude of the resultant force (R = sq. rt. of (Rx^2 + Ry^2)), and use trig to get the direction of the resultant force (Ry/Rx=tan theta.)
 
If they are collinear you can just add them, as long as you take sign into account. Otherwise, it is best to resolve them into x,y,and z components.
 
PhanthomJay said:
You can't just algebraically add them, since in general they have different directions. Split each vector into its x and y components, then add the x components together to get Rx, and add the y components together to get Ry, and use pythagorus to get the magnitude of the resultant force (R = sq. rt. of (Rx^2 + Ry^2)), and use trig to get the direction of the resultant force (Ry/Rx=tan theta.)

Thank you! I've been looking through my textbook for an hour! I remeber my teacher telling me about that.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top