Finding the Right String Length for a Dropping Mass

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the appropriate string length for a mass dropped from 4.29 meters, ensuring it lands within 25 cm of the ground using two springs. Participants are exploring the application of Hooke's Law and conservation of energy principles to predict the spring's stretch during the fall. They have established that air resistance is negligible and are considering the energy equation ΔE = 0 for their calculations. Clarifications are sought regarding the setup of the experiment, including the order of spring attachment and how to account for the springs' mass in their calculations. The conversation emphasizes the need for precise measurements and understanding of the system dynamics to achieve accurate results.
Masaharustin
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


My group and I have been tasked with choosing a string length so that a mass attached to two springs and the string, dropped from 4.29 meters, will fall within 25 cm of the ground. On the day of the drop we will be given the mass. We will use two springs that we already have and within ten minutes before the drop, must calculate the correct string length.
Constants:
Mass
drop height
the two springs (although the order in which they are used can be changed, we have taken data on both combinations)

*The only thing we can change is the length of the string from which the two springs and mass are hanging.

Homework Equations


Hooke's Law: k= mg/x
x = √(2U/k) * U is the spring's potential energy
u = .5kx^2

The Attempt at a Solution


The data we have taken so far as well as the calculated spring constants are in this google document.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AlOf8KvTeCTrdHBxaldGXzB6WWo5RXVSbTAzTmt5VUE

With the information we have now we can predict the stretch of a stationary spring. However, we cannot figure out how to predict the stretch when taking into account the force generated by the mass' fall from 4.29 m.

We would very much appreciate it if someone could simply point us in the right direction on how to go about this, we've kind of been thrown in the deep end. Thanks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


What conserved quantities are there going to be?
 


Sorry what do you mean by conserved quantities?

Thanks for the reply.
 


The quantities which are not lost in the system
 


This is a high school assignment, so I think [hope] we're not dealing with lost quantities.

EDIT: We made headway on the problem, air resistance is negligible. Are we correct in thinking that this equation applies?
ΔE = 0

-½ k x² + m g (h + x) = 0
 
Last edited:


Masaharustin said:
This is a high school assignment, so I think [hope] we're not dealing with lost quantities.

EDIT: We made headway on the problem, air resistance is negligible. Are we correct in thinking that this equation applies?
ΔE = 0

-½ k x² + m g (h + x) = 0

Conservation of energy should apply to a good approximation, at least for the first "bounce" and before much energy can be lost to heat through mechanical flexing of the springs.

Can you describe the precise setup for the "bungee" trial in more detail? It looks like you've got two different springs that are to be attached in series. When will you get to know the order of their attachment?

When you measured your spring displacements, were they 'end to end' measurements (attachment point to attachment point)? Did they include allowances for whatever means is required to connect them end to end, to loads, or to fixed attachment points?

Where will the added string be attached? At the top of the springs or at the bottom between the last spring and the load mass?

How exactly is the drop to be performed? Will the load mass be dropped from the height of the fixed top spring attachment with the springs initially unloaded, or in some other fashion?

How will you include the mass of the springs themselves in the calculations?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top