Finding the speed of a metal ball

  • Thread starter Thread starter smithers11
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball Metal Speed
AI Thread Summary
To find the speed of a 0.500 kg metal ball just before it touches the floor after rolling off a table, the conservation of energy principle is applied. The initial kinetic energy (KEi) from the ball's speed of 5.00 m/s and the potential energy (PEi) from its height of 1.00 meter are combined. The equation KEf = PEi + KEi is used to solve for the final kinetic energy (KEf) just before impact. Since the ramp is frictionless, the ball accelerates down the incline without losing energy. The final speed can be calculated using KEf = 0.5mv^2.
smithers11
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
alright, so here's my question that i have to answer:
"A ball of mass .500kg is rolling across a table top with a speed of 5.00 m/s. When the ball reaches the edge of the table, it rolls down a frictionless incline onto the floor 1.00 meter below (without bouncing). What is the speed of the ball when it reaches the floor (just before it touches the floor)?"

I use the equation PEf + KEf = PEi + KEi and then get KEf = PEi, which then leads to
.5mv^2 = mgh
From here, I'm stuck. Since the ramp is frictionless, does the ball accelerate the same as it would if it was dropped? And, how would I add in the initial speed of 5.00 m/s?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
smithers11 said:
I use the equation PEf + KEf = PEi + KEi and then get KEf = PEi, which then leads to
.5mv^2 = mgh
But KEi ≠ 0.
From here, I'm stuck. Since the ramp is frictionless, does the ball accelerate the same as it would if it was dropped?
No, it slides down the incline.
And, how would I add in the initial speed of 5.00 m/s?
That speed will be reflected in KEi.
 
ok so then i would change my equation to KEf = PEi + KEi, and then from there use the equation KEf = .5mv^2 to solve for the velocity (speed), right?
 
Right.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top