Finding the tension of the string (vertical circular motion)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the tension in a string during vertical circular motion of a ball. The ball, with a mass of 125g and a string length of 0.900 meters, is set in motion at 38 RPM. The tension at the top of the circle is calculated to be 0.553 N, while at the bottom, it is 3.01 N. There is a clarification on the conversion of RPM to period, correcting a misunderstanding about the relationship between revolutions per second and seconds per revolution. Overall, the calculations are confirmed to be correct despite the initial confusion regarding the time period.
littlebearrrr
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A ball of mass 125g is attached to a string .900 meters long. It is then set into vertical circular motion with 38 RPM. What is the tension of the string at the top of the circle and at the bottom of the circle?

Homework Equations



∑Fy = may = marad

arad = v2/R = 4∏2R/T2

The Attempt at a Solution



First, I found T (period) by using the given RPM:
(38 rev/1 min)(1 min/60 s) = 0.633 rev/s --> 1.58 s per revolution = T

Used T to calculate arad (radial acceleration):
arad = 4∏2(.900 m) / (1.58 s)2 = 14.23 m/s2

Finding the tension at the top of the circle:
The only forces acting on the ball at the top are its weight and the tension force acting in the same direction (downward). With these facts, I apply Newton's second law for the vertical direction and solve for the tension -
∑Fy = may = marad = w + T
T = marad - w = (.125 kg)(14.23 m/s2) - (.125 kg)(9.81 m/s2) = 0.553 N

Finding the tension at the bottom of the circle:
At the bottom, the forces now oppose each other. The tension is directed upward, while the weight remains directed down. Again, I apply Newton's second law -
∑Fy = may = marad = T - w
T = marad + w = (.125 kg)(14.23 m/s2) + (.125 kg)(9.81 m/s2) = 3.01 N

Just checking to see if this is correct. Thank you in advance!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, it's correct, except the part where you said 0.633 rev/s = 1.58 s per revolution. That's wrong. But it didn't affect your answer.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Ah, so it was just supposed to be 1.58s? Also, thanks for checking my answer. Appreciate it!
 
No, the problem is that the correct equation is 0.633 rev/s = 1/(1.58 s per revolution)
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Oh, got it! Thanks for pointing that out; I fixed it above. I have a bad habit of equating the wrong things when reporting answers sometimes, even when the answer is right. I definitely need to work on that.
 
littlebearrrr said:
Oh, got it! Thanks for pointing that out. I have a bad habit of equating the wrong things when reporting answers sometimes, even when the answer is right. I definitely need to work on that.

That happens because you're mentally saying "equal" when you ought to say "therefore". The mathematical symbol for therefore is an arrow \Rightarrow.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top