Finding the total charge from the graph

AI Thread Summary
A current of 1 A for one second equates to 1 Coulomb of charge, and for a constant current, charge can be calculated by multiplying current by time. In the interval from 1-2 ms, with a constant current of 10 mA, the charge is calculated as 10 µC, represented by the area under the graph. For the interval from 0-1 ms, the current is non-constant, increasing from 0 to 10 mA, so the average current is 5 mA, leading to a charge calculation that includes a factor of 1/2. Understanding this requires familiarity with integrals, as the total charge is determined by summing small charge increments over time.
red1312
Messages
20
Reaction score
1
Hi
I hope this the right place to put my question

image.jpg


I didn't understand how it became like this

Thank you
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
A current of 1 A during one second means that 1 Coulomb has passed by.
If the current is constant, all you have to do is multiply current and time to get charge.
For example in the period 1-2 ms the current is constant, so the charge is 1 ms x 10 mA = 10 ##\mu##C
Which is also the area in the graph under the red line from 1-2 ms.

For 0-1 you have a non-constant current and the area under the red line is 10 x 1 /2 in mA x ms .

--

Does this help ?
 
Thank you very much
I understood the first part
But sorry I didn't get it the last part which is the 1/2 ,,,

Thank you again
 
In the first msec the current increases from 0 to 10 mA. It isn't 10 mA all through this msec, so 10 x 1 would be too much by a factor of about 2 as you can see from geometry.
In this case the average current during the first msec is 5 mA and the factor of 2 is exact.
Could it be that you aren't all that familiar with integrals and that integrals represent an area ?

Basically all that's done is that we add up all the little bits of charge = ##\ \ ## i x ##\Delta##t ##\ \ ## for the period 0 - 1 ms and do so for very small time steps. In the limit ##\Delta##t ##\downarrow ##0, this becomes the integral ##\int i \ dt##
 
  • Like
Likes red1312
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top