Finding the y axis on a probability density graph

Sorin2225
Messages
20
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
I was given a probability density graph and from it I had to figure out what B was in nm^-1/2
Relevant Equations
I think it's just from the graph.
I assumed to find it I would need to find the area under the graph. I also assumed that the part under x would cancel out so I would be left with 2b*10=1 if it was, in fact, true that it had to equal to one. So my final answer was (1/10)/2 nm^-1 but the actual answer was 0.0845 nm^-1/2 and I'm unsure of how this answer was gained.
 

Attachments

  • physics graph.png
    physics graph.png
    1.5 KB · Views: 449
Physics news on Phys.org
That is not a probability density. A probability density can not be negative.

Judging by the use of the symbol ##\psi## I'm guessing this is a quantum mechanical wavefunction, so the actual probability density is ##|\psi|^2##. Your method was correct, that the total probability (total area) must be 1. So make that change and see how it works out.

The units of ##b## are another clue that you're supposed to be squaring these values to get the density, because ##b^2 \times## [length] is unitless.
 
To get b however I'm doing 3b*10-2b*10+2b*10=1 and rearranging for this but I'm nowhere near the right answer
 
Sorin2225 said:
To get b however I'm doing 3b*10-2b*10+2b*10=1

You shouldn't be. You're integrating ##\psi## with respect to ##x## and I just told you that ##\psi## is not the probability density, not the thing you should be integrating. Therefore trying to get a total probability of 1 by integrating ##\psi## is not a correct thing to do.

Again, you want to integrate the probability density. ##\psi## is not the probability density. Find the probability density and then integrate that.

I know you started from this assumption, in your original post:
Sorin2225 said:
I was given a probability density graph...

but what I'm trying to say is that you were not given a probability density graph. A probability density can not be negative. ##\psi## is by inspection not a probability density.
 
Yes sorry, I realized that my initial assumption about the type of graph was wrong. I am confused on how I am meant to be changing the probability into probability density. To do this I attempted
to square the probability
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top