Finding Thevenin Equivalent Circuit for Complex Network

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the Thevenin equivalent circuit for a complex network between terminals a and b. Participants share their calculations, seek verification, and explore different methods for obtaining the Thevenin voltage and impedance, including the use of loop equations and circuit simplifications.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents their calculations for the Thevenin equivalent, including the use of a voltage source and a current source, and requests verification of their results.
  • Another participant identifies potential errors in the calculations, particularly in the arithmetic and the inclusion of terms in the denominator of the impedance calculation.
  • There is a discussion about the handling of mutual inductances, with some participants agreeing on the approach while others seek confirmation of their final answers.
  • Multiple participants provide alternative methods for solving the circuit, including writing loop equations and transforming sources, suggesting different approaches to arrive at the Thevenin equivalent.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about specific calculations and seek clarification on where mistakes may have occurred, leading to further refinement of their results.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the final values for the Thevenin equivalent, with different calculations yielding varying results. There is ongoing debate about the correctness of specific calculations and methods used.

Contextual Notes

Participants note missing terms in calculations, unresolved arithmetic errors, and the need for clarity in the application of circuit analysis techniques. The discussion reflects a range of assumptions and interpretations regarding the circuit components and their interactions.

Lunat1c
Messages
64
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I wish to obtain the Thevenin equivalent for the network show in the attachment between the terminals a and b.

2. The attempt at a solution

First I considered the voltage source alone (replaced current source by an open circuit).

I = \frac{V}{Z_T} = \nfrac{20}{5+10+j5+j10+ (2*j4)} = 0.728A \angle-56.89\degrees

\therefore V_{AB}^1 = (0.728A\angle-56.89\degrees) * (5+10+j5+j4) = 12.74V\angle-25.92\degrees

Then I considered the current source alone (replaced the voltage source by a short):

Current through upper branch = \frac { 2A\angle90\degrees (10 + j5 + j10 - j4 + (2*j4))||5}{10+j5+j10-j4+ (2*j4)} = 0.282A\angle29.83\degrees

\therefore V_{AB}^2 = (0.282\angle29.83\degrees)(j10 -j4 + j4) = 2.82V\angle119.83\degrees

V_{AB} = V_{AB}^1 + V_{AB}^2 = 10.529V\angle-17.25\degrees

Can someone please check this for me? I'm not sure whether I did some mistake and I need to know whether I understood these.

Thank you for your time,

Lunat1c
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.jpg
    Untitled.jpg
    24 KB · Views: 449
Physics news on Phys.org
Lunat1c said:

Homework Statement



I wish to obtain the Thevenin equivalent for the network show in the attachment between the terminals a and b.

2. The attempt at a solution

First I considered the voltage source alone (replaced current source by an open circuit).

I = \frac{V}{Z_T} = \nfrac{20}{5+10+j5+j10+ (2*j4)} = 0.728A \angle-56.89\degrees

\therefore V_{AB}^1 = (0.728A\angle-56.89\degrees) * (5+10+j5+j4) = 12.74V\angle-25.92\degrees

Then I considered the current source alone (replaced the voltage source by a short):

Current through upper branch = \frac { 2A\angle90\degrees (10 + j5 + j10 - j4 + (2*j4))||5}{10+j5+j10-j4+ (2*j4)} = 0.282A\angle29.83\degrees

\therefore V_{AB}^2 = (0.282\angle29.83\degrees)(j10 -j4 + j4) = 2.82V\angle119.83\degrees

V_{AB} = V_{AB}^1 + V_{AB}^2 = 10.529V\angle-17.25\degrees

Can someone please check this for me? I'm not sure whether I did some mistake and I need to know whether I understood these.

Thank you for your time,

Lunat1c

Your first calculation should be:

I = \frac{V}{Z_T} = \frac{20}{5+10+j5+j10-j4+ (2*j4)}

Also, in this calculation, there is an error in your arithmetic:

Current through upper branch = \frac { 2A\angle90\degrees (10 + j5 + j10 - j4 + (2*j4))||5}{10+j5+j10-j4+ (2*j4)} = 0.282A\angle29.83\degrees

I get:

Current through upper branch = 2A\angle90\degrees \frac {(10 + j5 + j10 - j4 + (2*j4))||5}{10+j5+j10-j4+ (2*j4)} = 0.4131A\angle38.29\degrees

And, of course, these errors propagate into subsequent calculations.
 
Last edited:
The Electrician said:
Current through upper branch = 2A\angle90\degrees \frac {(10 + j5 + j10 - j4 + (2*j4))||5}{10+j5+j10-j4+ (2*j4)} = 0.4131A\angle38.29\degrees

And, of course, these errors propagate into subsequent calculations.

Ok, I agree with that part, found the mistake. However, do you agree with the rest of the working (especially the way I considered the mutual inductances)? I really wish to confirm whether I have the correct final answer or not. Now I got V_{AB}=9.225V\angle-13.79
 
For the final answer, I get 11.1156V\angle {-9.722} ^ \circ

Your handling of the mutual inductance seems essentially ok, but without showing all the calculations you showed in your first post, with the errors I pointed out corrected, I can't tell where you went wrong.
 
Last edited:
<br /> I = \frac{V}{Z_T} = \frac {20} {5+10+j5+j10+ (2*j4)} = 0.728A \angle-56.89\degrees <br />

<br /> \therefore V_{AB}^1 = (0.728A\angle-56.89\degrees) * (5+10+j5+j4) = 12.74V\angle-25.92\degrees <br /> <br /> 2A\angle90\degrees \frac {(10 + j5 + j10 - j4 + (2*j4))||5}{10+j5+j10-j4+ (2*j4)} = 0.4131A\angle38.29\degrees <br />

V_{AB}^2 = (0.4131A\angle38.29\degrees)(10 +j5 + j10 -j4 + 8j) = 8.87\angle100.53

V_{AB} = V_{AB}^1 + V_{AB}^2 = 10.33V\angle17.76

I can't see where I'm wrong...
 
Last edited:
Go have a look in post #2 where I said:

"Your first calculation should be:"

You're missing a -j4 term in the denominator of that V/Zt calculation.
 
Lunat1c said:
<br /> I = \frac{V}{Z_T} = \frac {20} {5+10+j5+j10+ (2*j4)} = 0.728A \angle-56.89\degrees <br />

<br /> \therefore V_{AB}^1 = (0.728A\angle-56.89\degrees) * (5+10+j5+j4) = 12.74V\angle-25.92\degrees <br />


<br /> 2A\angle90\degrees \frac {(10 + j5 + j10 - j4 + (2*j4))||5}{10+j5+j10-j4+ (2*j4)} = 0.4131A\angle38.29\degrees <br />

V_{AB}^2 = (0.4131A\angle38.29\degrees)(10 +j5 + j10 -j4 + 8j) = 8.87\angle100.53

V_{AB} = V_{AB}^1 + V_{AB}^2 = 10.33V\angle17.76

I can't see where I'm wrong...

I see another error. You should have:

V_{AB}^2 = (0.4131A\angle38.29\degrees)(j10 -j4 + 4j) = 4.131\angle128.29
 
You're right. Thanks a lot, I really appreciate you taking the time to go through my working.
 
You can also solve the system by writing a couple of loop equations. Replace the j2 current source in parallel with the 5 ohm resistor with a j10 voltage source in series with a 5 ohm resistor.

Consider two loop currents, I1 and I2. I1 is a clockwise loop passing through the j10 voltage source, the 5 ohm and 10 ohm resistors, the j5 inductor, and the short across the a-b terminals. I2 is a clockwise loop going around the entire circuit.

Then to solve for the two currents, solve this system. I1 will be the short circuit current through the shorted a-b terminals.

\left[ \begin{array}{2}15+j5 &amp; 15+j9\\15+j9 &amp; 15+j19\end{array}\right]\left[ \begin{array}{1}I_1\\I_2\\\end{array}\right]=\left[ \begin{array}{1}j10\\-20+j10\\\end{array}\right]

To find Zth, the Thevenin impedance, short the 20 volt source and the j10 source; connect a 1 volt source to the a-b terminals. The system then becomes:

\left[ \begin{array}{2}15+j5 &amp; 15+j9\\15+j9 &amp; 15+j19\end{array}\right]\left[ \begin{array}{1}I_1\\I_2\\\end{array}\right]=\left[ \begin{array}{1}1\\0\\\end{array}\right]

The solution to this system will give a current I1 whose reciprocal is numerically equal to the Thevenin impedance.

Multiply the current I1 from the first system solution, by the Thevenin impedance, which is 1/I1 from the second system, and you will have Vth, the Thevenin voltage.

This is how I solved your problem initially, and then examined your method to see where your errors were.

Edit:
It looks like the tex engine didn't properly format the 2x2 matrix on the left of the two systems above. Where you see a 4x1 matrix, convert it to a 2x2 by taking the terms row wise, two at a time.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K