Finding thickness of a thin film question

AI Thread Summary
To find the thickness of a thin oil film on pavement, the problem involves using the equations for constructive and destructive interference. The oil film has a refractive index of 1.23, reflecting red light at 640 nm and no light at 569 nm. The correct formulas for interference are 2nt = mλ for constructive and 2nt = (m - 1/2)λ for destructive interference. The discussion clarifies the application of these formulas and confirms their validity, emphasizing the importance of the phase change in determining the correct order of interference. The method discussed is deemed correct for solving the thickness of the film.
feelau
Messages
61
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A thin film of oil (n = 1.23) is located on a smooth, wet pavement. When viewed perpendicular to the pavement, the film reflects most strongly red light at 640 nm and reflects no light at 569 nm. How thick is the oil film?


Homework Equations


2nt=(m+.5)*(wavelength)------constructive interference
2nt=m* wavelength------------destructive interference
n=index of refraction
t= thickness
m= order number

The Attempt at a Solution


So I tried to set the two equations together and using the corresponding wavelengths to solve for m. Next I just plugged m into one of the equations and using the corresponding wavelength to find t. Is that the correct method of doing this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe you have the formulas for constructive and destructive interference reversed somewhat. They should be:

Constructive: 2nt = m\lambda

Destructive: 2nt = (m-1/2)\lambda
 
Hm I think they are the same thing. My textbook says it's that way, the only difference is the 90 degree phase change. But would be method be correct?
 
Yes, I guess they are both correct. Just in case you were wondering I looked up the formulas for thin films posted above in Knight's Physics book.(Not my favorite, but the only one I had on me.) Sorry for any confusion I may have caused.
 
Last edited:
np thanks for the verification
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top