Finding total energy when 3 point charges are far away

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the total energy of a system of two protons and an alpha particle positioned at the corners of an equilateral triangle. Initially, the total kinetic energy is zero since the charges are at rest, while the potential energy is derived from the interactions between the particles. The correct approach involves calculating the potential energy for each charge as they are brought into the system, taking into account the contributions from the other charges. The total energy when the particles are far apart is the sum of the potential energies, which leads to a formula that incorporates the charge of the alpha particle as twice that of a proton. Ultimately, as the particles move infinitely apart, all energy is converted to kinetic energy, maintaining the system's total energy.
THA
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
The question and detail:
Two protons and an alpha particle are held at rest at the corners of an equilateral triangle whose side length is 8.50×10^-10 m. The particles are released and move apart. What is their total energy when they are far apart? Use 1.60×10^-19 C for the magnitude of the charge on an electron.

I setup the problem using energy conservation: K_a + U_a = K_b + U_b:

K_a = total kinetic energy of the 3 charges when they're at rest
U_a = total potential energy of the 3 charges when they're at rest
K_b = total kinetic energy of the 3 charges when they're far apart
U_b = total potential energy of the 3 charges when they're far apart

K_a = 0 since the charges don't initially move
U_b = 0 when they're far away (when they're infinitely far away)

That leaves: U_a = K_b
where U_a = 3*(k*q_1*q_2)/r so
K_b = 3*(k*q_1*q_2)/r
and the answer I got was 3 * (8.9*10^9 * (1.6*10^-19)^2)/(8.50×10^-10) = 8.04*10^-19 which is incorrect.
Am I on the right track solving the problem? What am I overlooking?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your error was assuming that you simply triple the amount of energy of a single pair of charges.

Do it this way: place the first proton in empty space, how much work to do it? none, since no other charges are pushing it away.

Bring in the second proton. HOw much work? THe same amount that is equal to the potential energy when they are in place: (kq^2)/r

Now, when the alpha is brought in, it is being pushed away by two charges that are already there. The spot that the third charge (the alpha) goes into has a potential (voltage) that is the algebraic (not vector) sum of the potentials provided by the two protons in place. use the equation V=kq/r twice, once for each proton, to find the potential for that spot, then multiply the charge of the alpha to the potential to find potential energy. Add this to the potential energy of the two protons you already had for total energy.

since q_2 = 2(q_1), total energy is (5kq^2)/r
 
Let me see if I get this right, the potential to place the first proton is 0 so the work or potential energy required is 0.

The potential to place the second proton, due to the first proton, is (k*q)/r and the potential energy is (k*q^2)/r.

The potential to place the alpha particle is the sum of the potentials of both protons, (k*q)/r + (k*q)/r or 2(k*q)/r and the potential energy required is: q_alpha * 2(k*q)/r.

And the total energy is the sum of the potential energy of the system? 0 + (k*q^2)/r + q_alpha * 2(k*q)/r
Am I also correct that the alpha also has charge 1.6*10^-19? What about when the particles move very far away (towards infinity), would the total energy be 0?
 
The alpha particle has two protons and two nutrons, so its charge is twice that of the proton. Otherwise, your summary is correct.

When the particles move to "infinity," we assume that no other object has interfered with them, and all the total energy is still there in the form of KE. Inertia rules!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top