How Do You Find a Vector with a Specific Magnitude in the Opposite Direction?

AI Thread Summary
To find a vector in the opposite direction of <-4,1,2> with a magnitude of 3, first calculate the unit vector by normalizing the original vector, resulting in (4/sqrt(21), -1/sqrt(21), -2/sqrt(21)). The next step is to scale this unit vector by multiplying it by 3 to achieve the desired magnitude. The confusion arose from the initial interpretation of the problem, which was clarified as a basic precalculus concept rather than a calculus one. Understanding that vectors and their magnitudes are often introduced in precalculus helps contextualize the problem for those in higher-level math courses.
mmont012
Messages
39
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find a vector in the direction opposite to <-4,1,2>, that has a magnitude of 3.

Homework Equations


I think that I did the first part of the problem correctly:
<-4,1,2>
magnitude= sqrt[ (-4)^2+1^2+2^2 ]
= sqrt(16+1+4)
= sqrt(21)
(-4/sqrt(21), 1/sqrt(21), 2/sqrt(21) )
to get the opposite direction, I would just change the signs
(4/sqrt(21), -1/sqrt(21), -2/sqrt(21) )

But I am confused at where to go from here. What does it mean "that has a magnitude of 3"? I may have approached this problem incorrectly. Any help would be great. Thank you for stopping by.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have found a normal vector. The magnitude of a normal vector is ##1##.

Perhaps the answer is more trivial than it first appears, just think:

$$\sqrt{a^2 + b^2 + c^2} = 3$$

Select a vector ##<a, b, c>## such that the above is satisfied. Multiplying the original vector by ##-1## will help. In fact, one is the loneliest one, and the only one you'll ever need for this problem.
 
  • Like
Likes mmont012
As Zondrina has pointed out, you have correctly determined a unit vector in the desired direction. Now, what do you need to multiply this unit vector by to produce a vector having the same direction, but with a magnitude of 3?

Chet
 
  • Like
Likes mmont012
Ah, okay. I think that I was making this problem more difficult than it actual is. Thank you so much for the help!
 
Removed "Calc III" from thread title -- this is really a precalc type of problem. Also moved thread to the precalc forum section.
 
How is this a pre-calc problem if I'm in calc 3 and this is the first time that I've dealt with this? Did my university just not cover this? Or am I behind?
 
mmont012 said:
How is this a pre-calc problem if I'm in calc 3 and this is the first time that I've dealt with this? Did my university just not cover this? Or am I behind?
Vectors in R2 and R3 are often covered in precalculus with trig courses.
 
mmont012 said:
How is this a pre-calc problem if I'm in calc 3 and this is the first time that I've dealt with this? Did my university just not cover this? Or am I behind?
No limits, no derivatives, no integrals = no calculus.

Your calc 3 course may simply be providing a refresher on basic vector math before jumping into vector calculus.
 
Back
Top