Finding Velocity on a Circular Amusement Park Ride

  • Thread starter Thread starter joeth04
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circular
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a circular amusement park ride, where the goal is to find the velocity of a chair attached to a massless chain. The ride has a diameter of 8.0 meters, and the chair, weighing 10 kg, is connected by a 2.5 m chain at an angle to the vertical. The user expresses confusion about the necessary equations, including centripetal force and angular velocity, and feels they lack sufficient information to solve the problem. An attachment meant to clarify the problem is pending approval, preventing others from viewing it. The user seeks guidance on how to approach the problem effectively.
joeth04
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Alright I had a midterm in my physics class today, and was completley stumped on this problem. Either I'm missing an equation or just not getting it, if you could lead me in the right direction i'd appreciate it. I also am attaching a picture of the problem that I drew in paint.

Homework Statement


The problem states that the circular ride platform has a diameter of 8.0 meters and the 2.5 m "massless chain" is attached to the chair at an angle theta to vertical. The chair is 10 kg, what is the velocity? I know I forgot to put the decimal points in the attached drawing, it should not make much of a difference either way.


Homework Equations


Fc = m*v2/R
v = omega*R


The Attempt at a Solution


I do not have enough givens for either of these equations.
 

Attachments

  • physics1301-2.jpg
    physics1301-2.jpg
    7.5 KB · Views: 476
Physics news on Phys.org
It seems like something is wrong with the attachment because I cannot open it (no link).
 
it says the attachment is pending approval.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top