Finding Velocity via Convervation of Energy

  • Thread starter Thread starter Norngpinky
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Velocity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a projectile motion problem using the conservation of energy principle. The initial energy is calculated using the formula for kinetic energy and gravitational potential energy, while the final energy is expressed solely in terms of kinetic energy. A common mistake highlighted is the incorrect application of the initial velocity component in the calculations, as the problem should not involve 2D motion analysis. The correct approach is to use the initial velocity of 195 m/s directly in the energy equation. The final velocity when the projectile strikes the ground is derived from this corrected understanding of energy conservation.
Norngpinky
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A projectile is shot upward from the top of a cliff in an angle of 25 with a velocity of 195 m/s.The height of the cliff is 315m. What will be its speed when it strikes the ground below? (Use conservation of energy)



Homework Equations


Ok...initial energy = final energy

Initial energy = .5m*(initial velocity square) + mgy
Final energy = .5m*(final velocity square)

initial velocity = sin*theta*upward initial velocity = sin25*195


The Attempt at a Solution



So I set them to equal and I got final V to be 114, but it says I had it wrong, canceling out the mass... I have no clue what I did wrong there...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
initial velocity = sin*theta*upward initial velocity = sin25*195
should not be used in this one. It is an energy problem, not a 2D motion analysis. Just use the 195 in the first 1/2m*v^2.
 
Delphi51 said:
should not be used in this one. It is an energy problem, not a 2D motion analysis. Just use the 195 in the first 1/2m*v^2.

OK, thank you! =)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top