Finite Square Well Analysis: Odd Bound States & Scattering States

broegger
Messages
257
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have a problem with the finite square well. I have to analyze the odd bound states of the finite square well,

V(x)=<br /> \begin{cases}<br /> -V_0 &amp; \text{for } -a&lt;x&lt;a\\<br /> 0 &amp; \text{otherwise}<br /> \end{cases}. <br />​

Specifically, I have to examine the limiting cases (wide, deep well and narrow, shallow well) and find out, if there is always at least one odd bound state.

When I try to determine the energies of these odd states, I find that E=0 is always a solution. Is E=0 a bound state, a scattering state or what?

Also, what exactly are scattering states?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
broegger said:
Hi,

I have a problem with the finite square well. I have to analyze the odd bound states of the finite square well,

V(x)=<br /> \begin{cases}<br /> -V_0 &amp; \text{for } -a&lt;x&lt;a\\<br /> 0 &amp; \text{otherwise}<br /> \end{cases}. <br />​

Specifically, I have to examine the limiting cases (wide, deep well and narrow, shallow well) and find out, if there is always at least one odd bound state.

Okay,did you find the "normal" /general sollution...?Odd states refer to the behavior of wavefunctions under parity...In your case,depending on the E:V,it could be only \sin or \sinh [/tex].<br /> <br /> Bound states are normalizable states,physical states according to I-st postulate...In your case,which would be those...??<br /> Scattering states would correspond to nonnormalizable states...<br /> <br /> Daniel.
 
Scattering states are those that satisfy the Somerfeld Radiation Condition, which is obeyed if a state behaves like a plane wave at infinity. Drop a rock in a water wave, say from a speed boat. The wave pattern will settle down and stabilize-- the original wave will still be going, as will "scattered waves" generated by the rock -- and these waves will behave like free waves, once they've gone out a bit from the rock's splash.
Regards,
Reilly Atkinson
 
dextercioby said:
Okay,did you find the "normal" /general sollution...?Odd states refer to the behavior of wavefunctions under parity...In your case,depending on the E:V,it could be only \sin or \sinh [/tex].<br /> <br /> Bound states are normalizable states,physical states according to I-st postulate...In your case,which would be those...??<br /> Scattering states would correspond to nonnormalizable states...<br /> <br /> Daniel.
<br /> <br /> My question is really, does E=0 correspond to a bound state? I hope not, because this implies that there is always one odd, bound state (and there isn&#039;t according to the book).
 
No,the wave function is a "sine",which is not a bound state...It's not normalizable...

Daniel.
 
Ok, thanks!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top