First and Second Law of Thermodynamics

AI Thread Summary
In a thermally isolated cylinder with an ideal gas, adding heat Q while maintaining constant temperature T_0 results in no change in internal energy, as per the first law of thermodynamics. The work done by the gas during expansion is equal to the heat added, but this scenario raises questions about the second law of thermodynamics, which suggests that not all heat can be converted into work without an external energy source. The total work done by the gas is dependent on the change in volume, but independent of the piston area, as the pressure and area factors cancel each other out in the work equation. The discussion emphasizes the relationship between heat transfer, work done, and the laws of thermodynamics in this ideal gas scenario. Understanding these principles is crucial for analyzing thermodynamic processes accurately.
Soaring Crane
Messages
461
Reaction score
0
An ideal gas is confined within a thermally isolated cylinder. It consists of N atoms initially at a pressure of p_0. A movable piston seals the right end of the cylinder. A given amount of heat Q is slowly added to the gas, while the piston allows the gas to expand in such a way that the gas's temperature remains constant at T_0.

Is the internal energy of the gas the same before and after Q is added?
Is this true since it has to follow the law of the conservation of energy?

Does the second law of thermodynamics forbid converting all of the absorbed heat Q into work done by the piston?
Is the movable piston a cycle? I think it is, so it must follow the second law?

Is the total work done by the gas independent of the area of the piston?

Well, the total work is dW = p*dV, and since V = A*h, then work is dependent and not independent?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Soaring Crane said:
An ideal gas is confined within a thermally isolated cylinder. It consists of N atoms initially at a pressure of p_0. A movable piston seals the right end of the cylinder. A given amount of heat Q is slowly added to the gas, while the piston allows the gas to expand in such a way that the gas's temperature remains constant at T_0.

Is the internal energy of the gas the same before and after Q is added?
Is this true since it has to follow the law of the conservation of energy?

What does James Prescott Joule's experiment tell u about ideal gases...??

Soaring Crane said:
Does the second law of thermodynamics forbid converting all of the absorbed heat Q into work done by the piston?
Is the movable piston a cycle?

What??What kind of the process is described in the problem...?

Soaring Crane said:
Is the total work done by the gas independent of the area of the piston?

Well, the total work is dW = p*dV, and since V = A*h, then work is dependent and not independent?

Think again...What is changing in the volume...??The area or the "length" of the tube (improperly said)?

Daniel.
 
Soaring Crane said:
An ideal gas is confined within a thermally isolated cylinder. It consists of N atoms initially at a pressure of p_0. A movable piston seals the right end of the cylinder. A given amount of heat Q is slowly added to the gas, while the piston allows the gas to expand in such a way that the gas's temperature remains constant at T_0.

Is the internal energy of the gas the same before and after Q is added?
Is this true since it has to follow the law of the conservation of energy?
Use the Ideal gas law: PV=nRT = internal energy of the gas. If T and n do not change then PV cannot change. (Since V increases, P must decrease as 1/V).

Does the second law of thermodynamics forbid converting all of the absorbed heat Q into work done by the piston?
Is the movable piston a cycle? I think it is, so it must follow the second law?
This is an interesting question. Since the container is thermally isolated, no heat can escape. The first law says that \Delta Q = \Delta U + \Delta W. Since \Delta U = \Delta PV = nR\Delta T = 0 in this process, it would appear that \Delta Q = \Delta W where \Delta W is the work done by the system. Since this would violate the second law, we can conclude that this is not the entire system. I think the second law tells us that there had to be an external source of energy, in addition to the added heat, to move the piston and expand the gas. The heat alone could not do the work of moving the piston.

Is the total work done by the gas independent of the area of the piston?

Well, the total work is dW = p*dV, and since V = A*h, then work is dependent and not independent?
I don't think so. The total work done by the gas is:

\int_{V_i}^{V_f} PdV = \int_{V_i}^{V_f} \frac{dV}{V} = ln(\frac{V_i}{V_f})

It is independent of the area of the piston.

AM
 
Soaring Crane said:
Is the total work done by the gas independent of the area of the piston?

Well, the total work is dW = p*dV, and since V = A*h, then work is dependent and not independent?

While it is true that V = A*h, it is also true that p = F/A. So the A's cancel each other out and the work done is therefore independent of the area. :smile:
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top