I First excited state of Helium. Triplets and Singlet

JamesHG
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
My question is the following one:

If i have the first excited state of helium, the possibilities for the two electrons are : 1s+,2s+ , 1s+2s-, 1s-,2s- and 1s-,2s+ , where + and - denotes spin up and down. If I use the slater's determinant to generate antisymmetric states, I get :

$$|u1> = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}[|1s,2s> - |2s,1s>]\otimes|1,1>$$
$$|u2> = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}[|1s+,2s-> - |2s-,1s+>]$$
$$|u3> = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}[|1s,2s> - |2s,1s>]\otimes|1,-1>$$
$$|u4> = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}[|1s-,2s+> - |2s+,1s->]$$

how i should i know which state (|u2> or |u4>) belows to singlet or triplet state if they can't be separed as tensorial product?

And why the energy from singlet and triplets are different?

Note : The |1,1> ... etc kets are referred to the coupled basis.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The eigenstates of He have a (approximately) definite spin, therefore its eigenstates must be a product between the spatial function and the spin function. Your first and third states already satisfy this requirement, but the rest do not. If you write those improper states correctly you should get one with spin function ##|1,0\rangle## which is a triplet and the other one with spin function ##|0,0\rangle## which is the only singlet. Hint: try forming linear combinations of ##u_2## and ##u_4##.
JamesHG said:
And why the energy from singlet and triplets are different?
The states you write there result from a Hamiltonian ignoring electron-electron repulsion. You can see how the incorporation of this Coulomb term affect the energies by treating it as a perturbation. You should see that the excited singlet states lie higher than the corresponding triplet state.
 
Thank you so much for answering my question!
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...

Similar threads

Back
Top