First Order Differential Equation

AI Thread Summary
A recent college graduate borrows $100,000 at a 9% interest rate to buy a condominium and plans to make monthly payments of $800(1 + t/120). The discussion reveals a mistake in the differential equation setup, specifically regarding the interest rate, which should be divided by 12 to reflect monthly compounding. The correct formulation leads to the conclusion that the loan will be fully paid off in approximately 135.36 months. The integration process was confirmed to be accurate, with the primary error being the handling of the interest rate. This adjustment clarifies the payment schedule and resolves the initial confusion regarding the loan repayment timeline.
DivGradCurl
Messages
364
Reaction score
0
"A recent college graduate borrows $100,000 at an interest rate of 9% to purchase a condominium. Anticipating steady salary increases, the buyer expects to make payments at a monthly rate of 800(1 + t/120), where t is the number of months since the loan was made. Assuming that this payment schedule can be maintained, when will the loan be fully paid?"

Please, help me find where I made a mistake. Here's what I've got:

S_0 = \$ 100,000

r = 0.09

k(t) = \$ 800 \left( 1 + \frac{t}{120} \right) / \mbox{month}

\frac{dS}{dt}=rS-k(t), \qquad S(0)=S_0

\frac{dS}{dt}-rS=-k(t)

\mu = \exp \left( -r \int dt \right) = e ^{-rt}

S(t)=e^{rt}\int -800 \left( 1 + \frac{t}{120} \right) e ^{-rt} \: dt

S(t)=e^{rt}\left( \frac{20e^{-rt}}{3r^2} + \frac{800e^{-rt}}{r} + \frac{20e^{-rt}t}{3r} + \mathrm{C} \right)

S(t) = \frac{20t}{3r} + \frac{800}{r} + \frac{20}{3r^2} + \mathrm{C} e^{rt}

t=0 \Rightarrow \frac{800}{r} + \frac{20}{3r^2} + \mathrm{C} = S_0 \Rightarrow \mathrm{C} = \frac{-20-2400r+3r^2 S_0}{3r^2}

S(t)=\frac{20}{3r^2} - \frac{20e^{rt}}{3r^2} + \frac{800}{r} - \frac{800e^{rt}}{r} + S_0 e^{rt} + \frac{20t}{3r}

S(t)=0 \Rightarrow t \approx - 131 \mbox{ months}

which is WRONG!

Any help is highly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
thiago_j said:
"A recent college graduate borrows $100,000 at an interest rate of 9% to purchase a condominium. Anticipating steady salary increases, the buyer expects to make payments at a monthly rate of 800(1 + t/120), where t is the number of months since the loan was made. Assuming that this payment schedule can be maintained, when will the loan be fully paid?"

Please, help me find where I made a mistake. Here's what I've got:

S_0 = \$ 100,000

r = 0.09

k(t) = \$ 800 \left( 1 + \frac{t}{120} \right) / \mbox{month}

\frac{dS}{dt}=rS-k(t), \qquad S(0)=S_0

\frac{dS}{dt}-rS=-k(t)

\mu = \exp \left( -r \int dt \right) = e ^{-rt}

S(t)=e^{rt}\int -800 \left( 1 + \frac{t}{120} \right) e ^{-rt} \: dt

S(t)=e^{rt}\left( \frac{20e^{-rt}}{3r^2} + \frac{800e^{-rt}}{r} + \frac{20e^{-rt}t}{3r} + \mathrm{C} \right)

S(t) = \frac{20t}{3r} + \frac{800}{r} + \frac{20}{3r^2} + \mathrm{C} e^{rt}

t=0 \Rightarrow \frac{800}{r} + \frac{20}{3r^2} + \mathrm{C} = S_0 \Rightarrow \mathrm{C} = \frac{-20-2400r+3r^2 S_0}{3r^2}

S(t)=\frac{20}{3r^2} - \frac{20e^{rt}}{3r^2} + \frac{800}{r} - \frac{800e^{rt}}{r} + S_0 e^{rt} + \frac{20t}{3r}

S(t)=0 \Rightarrow t \approx - 131 \mbox{ months}

which is WRONG!

Any help is highly appreciated.

I can't say I completely follow what you are doing, but it seems to me you have two different time scales going on and you may have lost track of the initial value a few equations into your analysis. If you were making no payments, the amount owed would be increasing every month. In the continuous interest limit you would have

S(t)=S_0 e^{rt/12}

where r is the annual interest rate and t is in months. The payments were already expressed in terms of t in months and of course they reduce the value of S(t). So I think you need

\frac{dS}{dt}=rS/12 -k(t), \qquad S(0)=S_0
 
Your integration is all correct, so it is something small, OlderDan seems to be making sense to me.
 
You're right. It's something pretty small. I should have divided r by 12, which ultimately gives the correct answer: t = 135.36 months.

Thanks
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top