First Order Linear Differential Equations

mit_hacker
Messages
86
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In a particular cosmological model,
the Friedmann equation takes the form L^2 (a')2 = a^2 − 2a^2 + 1, where L is a positive constant,
the dot denotes time differentiation, and the initial condition is a(0) = 1. What are the units of
L? Show, without solving this equation, that the universe described by this model is never smaller
than a certain minimum size. Now solve the equation and describe the history of this universe.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I basically considered this as an autonomous equation and found the critical points. Once A takes those values, the derivative will be 0 so the value of the function will not change. In class however, my tutor discussed some other weird (in my opinion) method of solving the problem which simply went over my head. Can someone please help me confirm whether I'm correct?

Also, I don't see how we can "describe the history of this universe" by solving this equation. Please advise!

Thank-you very much for your kind co-operation!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If I put a(0)=1 into your equation it looks like a'(0)=0. So the solution is the trivial solution a(t)=1 for all t. It hardly matters how you solve something like that. I suspect there is either a typo or unclear notation. Can you clarify what the ODE actually is??
 
Last edited:
Did you mean to write (a')^2? Also what is the point of writing a^2 − 2a^2 instead of −a^2?
 
Of course, the whole question makes no sense without saying what the variable a reoresents physically! The "diameter" of the universe?

Also I notice this is titled "First Order Linear Differential Equations". While that differential equation is first order, it definitely is not linear!
 
Ouch!

I agree with all of you but that's lecturer what it is. It's probably one of those questions which the lecturer set by mistake or just for the sake of it.

Evidently, everything about it is wrong so I guess I'll just ignore the question. Thanks you guys for your help!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top