First Order Notch Filter: Building Guide

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bromio
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    First order
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the design and theoretical considerations of a first-order notch filter, specifically focusing on the characteristics of its transfer function, H(s), and the implications of having two complex zeros and one real pole. Participants explore the stability and frequency response of such a filter, as well as potential circuit designs.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the feasibility of a notch filter with a specific transfer function format, H(s) = \displaystyle\frac{s^2+4}{s+1000}.
  • Another participant argues that the proposed transfer function may not achieve the desired magnitude response due to the insufficient number of poles to stabilize the increase in response at higher frequencies.
  • A third participant notes a common issue when the order of the numerator exceeds that of the denominator in a transfer function, referring to it as a "nasty differentiator."
  • A participant raises a question about the stability of the system, pointing out that while the system is stable due to the pole's position, the output may still tend toward infinity at high frequencies, creating a contradiction.
  • Another participant presents a circuit design with a similar transfer function format and seeks validation of its correctness.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the adequacy of the proposed transfer function and its implications for stability and frequency response. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the correctness of the circuit design and the theoretical implications of the filter's characteristics.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations related to the number of poles and zeros in the transfer function, as well as the assumptions regarding system stability and output behavior at high frequencies. These factors contribute to the ongoing debate without reaching a consensus.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to electrical engineers, students studying filter design, and practitioners involved in circuit design and analysis.

Bromio
Messages
59
Reaction score
0
Hello.

Is there any way to build a band reject filter ('notch') whose transfer function, H(s), has only two complex zeros and only one real pole?

For example:

H(s) = \displaystyle\frac{s^2+4}{s+1000}
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Here is the problem with this.

The pole would determine the where magnitude response starts to decrease significantly at the lower frequencies of the trough. One zero would determine around what frequencies the the magnitude response would become approximately level (the trough of the magnitude response), and the other zero would determine at what frequency the magnitude response would increase significantly, at the higher frequencies of the trough.

One more pole would be required to level off this increase. Otherwise the magnitude response may look something like the attached image.
 

Attachments

  • 3ZP.png
    3ZP.png
    2.3 KB · Views: 468
we generally have a small problem (the nasty differentiator) when the order of the numerator is higher than that of the denominator in a transfer function.
 
I understand everything you say. However, there is an issue that I'd like to be clarified.

As you can see in the image attached two posts above, if the system input is limited, |x(t)| < B (B real), then the system output won't be limited too, because the magnitude response will tend to infinity at high frequencies. However, this electric circuit has only a pole, which is in the negative real axis, so the system is stable.

How can these facts both agree?
 
I've been thinking of a circuit whose transfer function has the same format as that written above. I've attached its diagram.

H(s) = -\displaystyle\frac{L}{R}\displaystyle\frac{s^2+ \displaystyle\frac{1}{LC_2}}{s+\displaystyle\frac{1}{RC_1}}

Is it incorrect?

Thank you.
 

Attachments

  • Circuit.png
    Circuit.png
    2 KB · Views: 487

Similar threads

  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
6K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K