First-Order Perturbation Theory Derivation in Griffiths

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 2K views
BucketOfFish
Messages
60
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



On page 251 of Griffiths's quantum book, when deriving a result in first-order perturbation theory, the author makes the claim that [tex]<\psi^0|H^0\psi^1> = <H^0\psi^0|\psi^1>[/tex] where [itex]H^0[/itex] is the unperturbed Hamiltonian and [itex]\psi^0[/itex] and [itex]\psi^1[/itex] are the unperturbed wavefunction and its first-order correction.

Homework Equations



[tex]H^0\psi^0=E^0\psi^0[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



From the derivations I've seen of Hermitian operators, I seem to understand that both sides of the expression in the braket have to be eigenfunctions of the operator for the operator to be symmetric. If this is the case, then I feel that Griffiths's explanation may be lacking something, since there is no guarantee that the first-order wavefunction correction is an eigenfunction of the unperturbed Hamiltonian. In this case, you could not switch the Hamiltonian operator around like this.

I must be misunderstanding something! Can someone help me clear this up?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Ah yes, I forgot that observables are not just for stationary states. Thanks for your help, vela!