First-order time-dependent perturbation theory on a Hydrogen atom

boyu
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A Hydrogen atom is initially in its ground state and then subject to a pulsed electric field E(t)=E_{0}\delta(t) along the z direction. We neglect all fine-structure and hyperfine-structure corrections.

Homework Equations



1. It is important to use selection rules to avoid unnecessary calculations of many zero transition matrix elements. According to the selection rule associated with electric dipole transitions, what is the final angular momentum quantum number l in order to have a nonzero transition amplitude?

2. For an excited state |nlm>, its angular part Y^{m}_{l}(\theta,\phi) will contain a term exp(im\phi). Based on this observation, show that the transition probability from the ground state to a final state would be zero if the quantum number m of the final state is not zero.

3. Calculate the transition probability to an arbitrary excited state using the first-order time-dependent perturbation theory. You don't need to evaluate the matrix elements of the dipole operator explicitly.

4. Can you calculate the total transition probability (that is, the sum of transition proba-
bilities to all excited states)? Note that here we cannot use Fermi's golden rule because
the final states are a collection of discrete states.

The Attempt at a Solution



1. Selection rules: \Delta l=1 ---> l=1

2. m=0

3. Transition probability from first order time-dependent perturbation theory:
P_{n<-m}=|<\psi^{0}_{n}|\hat{U}(t,t_{0})|\psi^{0}_{m}>|^{2}=|<\psi^{0}_{n}|\hat{U}_{I}(t,t_{0})|\psi^{0}_{m}>|^{2}=(\frac{1}{hbar})^{2}|\int^{t}_{0}<\psi^{0}_{n}|\hat{V}(t_{1})|\psi^{0}_{m}>e^{i(E^{0}_{n}-E^{0}_{m})(t_{1}-t_{0})/hbar}dt_{1}|^{2}

where \psi_{m}=\psi_{1}=\psi_{100}
\psi_{n}=\psi_{n}=\psi_{n10}
\hat{V}(t)=-q\overline{r}\cdot E_{0}\delta(t)\widehat{z}
t_{0}=0
\omega_{nm}=\frac{(E^{0}_{n}-E^{0}_{m})}{hbar}

Then I have

P_{n1}=(\frac{|\overline{d}_{n1}\cdot\widehat{z}|E_{0}}{hbar})^{2}|\int^{t}_{0}\delta(t_{1})e^{i\omega_{n1}t_{1}}dt_{1}|^{2}=(\frac{|\overline{d}_{n1}\cdot\widehat{z}|E_{0}}{hbar})^{2}|e^{i\omega_{n1}t}|^{2}=(\frac{|\overline{d}_{n1}\cdot\widehat{z}|E_{0}}{hbar})^{2}

4. Total transition probability
P_{total}=\sum^{\infty}_{n=2}P_{n<-1}=(\frac{E_{0}}{hbar})^{2}\sum^{\infty}_{n=2}|\vec{d_{n1}}\cdot \hat{z}|^{2}

where \vec{d_{n1}}\cdot \hat{z}=q<n10|z|100>

After this, I have to use the formula of radial wavefunction for Hydrogen atom
R_{nl}=\sqrt{(\frac{2}{na})^{3}\frac{(n-l-1)!}{2n[(n+1)!]^{3}}}e^{-r/na}(2r/na)^{l}[L^{2l+1}_{n-l-1}(2r/na)]
set l=1, and get the function of n, then plug into the formula for total transition probability which is a summation of n.

The problem is, that I can't find the formula of R_{nl} for n=n and l=1.
Can anyone show me how to continue my derivation?

Many thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
In your expression

<br /> R_{nl}=\sqrt{(\frac{2}{na})^{3}\frac{(n-l-1)!}{2n[(n+1)!]^{3}}}e^{-r/na}(2r/na)^{l}[L^{2l+1}_{n-l-1}(2r/na)]<br />

you have the generalized Laguerre polynomials, which can be computed from

L^p_q(x) = \frac{ x^{-p} e^x}{q! } \frac{d^q}{dx^q}(e^{-x} x^{p+q}).

There are more relations that you can probably find in your textbook or at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laguerre_polynomial#Generalized_Laguerre_polynomials
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top