First principles/induction proof

  • Thread starter forty
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Proof
In summary, the formula for the sum of an arithmetic progression, 1 + 2 + 3 + ... + n, is n(n+1)/2. To prove this, one can use both first principles and induction. First, imagine the sum n + n-1 + n-2 + ... + 1, which is the same as the original sum but written in reverse order. When added together, the terms cancel out and result in n(n+1)/2. For the inductive proof, one can start by showing the formula is true for n=1, and then using the inductive step to prove for n+1.
  • #1
forty
135
0
1 + 2 + 3 + ... + n = n(n+1)/2

I need to prove this by first principles and by induction.

I am extraordinarily stuck with this and don't really know where to begin, I've tried writing the LHS in terms of n then trying to simplify but am pretty much stuck. Any suggestions of how to begin for either method would be very much appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
This is an arithmetic progression with d=1. To start off, imagine the sum:
n + n-1 + n-2 + ... + 1 , which is the same as the above, but written in the reverse order. What happens if you add one sum to the other?
 
  • #3
Sorry for my lack of understanding but what do you mean by this..

What happens if you add one sum to the other?

do you mean what happens when you add n + (n-1) + (n-2) and so on? Because if that's what you mean i have no idea >.<
 
  • #4
He means what happens when you sum

1 + 2 + 3 + ... n-2 + n-1 + n
n + n-1 + n-2 + ... + 3 + 2 + 1
 
  • #5
scast said:
He means what happens when you sum

1 + 2 + 3 + ... n-2 + n-1 + n
n + n-1 + n-2 + ... + 3 + 2 + 1

This is all fine, but the OP needs an inductive proof. Begin by showing the formula is true for say n=1. Let's call P(n)=n(n+1)/2. Now assume 1+...+n=P(n). You want to prove 1+...+(n+1)=P(n+1). Take the difference of the two equations. (n+1)=P(n+1)-P(n). Can you prove that? That's the inductive step.
 
  • #6
No, the OP said he needed and proof "from first principles" and an inductive proof. forty and scast were trying to lead him to the first.
 

Related to First principles/induction proof

1. What is the difference between first principles and induction proof?

First principles and induction proof are two different methods of reasoning in scientific inquiry. First principles refer to the basic, foundational principles or assumptions that are used to build a logical argument. Induction proof, on the other hand, is a form of reasoning where conclusions are drawn from specific observations or examples. In other words, first principles are used to establish the reasoning behind a hypothesis, while induction proof is used to test and validate the hypothesis.

2. How do you use first principles in scientific research?

First principles are used as a starting point for scientific research. They provide a basic understanding of the fundamental principles and assumptions underlying a phenomenon or problem. Scientists then use these principles to build a logical argument and develop hypotheses that can be tested through experimentation or observation.

3. What is the process of induction proof in scientific research?

The process of induction proof involves observing specific instances or examples, and then drawing general conclusions or patterns from these observations. These generalizations are then tested through further observations or experiments to determine their validity. This process is often used in fields such as biology, where it is not always possible to test every individual organism, but patterns and conclusions can still be drawn from observed examples.

4. What are the advantages of using first principles in scientific research?

Using first principles in scientific research allows for a more thorough understanding of a phenomenon or problem. By starting from basic principles and building a logical argument, scientists can develop a deeper understanding of the underlying mechanisms at play. This approach also allows for the development of new and innovative hypotheses, rather than relying solely on existing knowledge.

5. Are there any limitations to using induction proof in scientific research?

While induction proof can be a valuable tool in scientific research, there are also some limitations to consider. One limitation is that conclusions drawn from induction proof are based on a limited number of observations or examples, which may not accurately represent the entire population. Additionally, induction proof relies on the assumption that patterns observed in the past will continue to hold true in the future, which may not always be the case.

Similar threads

  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
435
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
6
Views
1K
Back
Top