Schools First Quarter Classes at a University

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a student's recent orientation experience and course selection for their first quarter, focusing on maintaining a high GPA for competitive engineering programs. The student has already enrolled in Physics 121 and Calculus 125, seeking advice on an additional prerequisite course without overloading themselves. Suggestions include taking Chemistry or Engineering Thermodynamics, both of which are manageable alongside physics. The conversation highlights that prior knowledge of Calculus II will aid in handling the coursework, as much of it involves problem-solving rather than intensive studying. Overall, the emphasis is on balancing course load while ensuring a solid foundation in engineering prerequisites.
Domn
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone, I went to my orientation yesterday. Overall it was very enjoyable. During high school I did both Calculus 1, and Calculus 2. Due to my grade in Calculus 2, my adviser suggested I retake it to keep my GPA as high as possible. She explained that I need to maintain a 3.5 in my prerequisites to be competitive for mechanical, or aerospace engineering.

So far, I signed up for Physics 121 (Mechanics) with a tutorial, and lab. Calculus 125 (calc 2), and now I'm looking at another three to five credit course. I have all of my humanities, electives, and social sciences complete due to my work in high school, so I'm trying to only take prerequisites. Can someone suggest me another prerequisite from this page?
http://www.engr.washington.edu/sites/default/files/curr_students/docs/ME_2011.pdf
I don't want to overburden myself, and burn out my first quarter.

Also, does anyone have any experience with UW's intro physics series. Any advice would be appreciated. My adviser was trying to sign me up to knock down chem my first quarter, but I've always wanted to take a physics course, having never taken one in high school.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since you already know Calc II (often considered the hardest out of the series) and taking one physics course, adding just about any third course shouldn't burn you out as long as you're not working a lot of hours or something.

It looks like your options, for the most part, are Chemistry if you want to get rid of a science credit, or Engineering Thermodynamics if you want to get a head start on the engineering portion. IMO either one should be fine. :) Chemistry is semi-difficultish, but I was able to get a B+ while working 40hrs and taking two other classes, so it's doable along with physics if you're a full-time student, I would think. All of them will have a lot of problems to work through that mostly take practice, so there will probably be a lot of busywork regardless. Like I said, knowing calc II already will help a lot because you'll mostly be working problems rather than doing hard studying.
 
seaofghosts said:
Since you already know Calc II (often considered the hardest out of the series)...

I'm not sure that Calculus II is the hardest in the OP's case, because infinite series, which I consider to be the hardest topic in Calculus, is not covered in his Calculus II course. I notice that his school is on a quarter system, so there are four courses in the sequence. (Actually five, but the fifth one, MATH 326, has material that is beyond the "standard" calculus sequence.)
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
63
Views
8K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Back
Top