Fitting Power Function to Graph Potential vs Distance: What is n?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around fitting a power function to graph potential (Volts) against distance (r) using the equation F(r)=Ar^n. The exponent 'n' represents the power in the function, which can vary and is determined by the best fit for the data. The user has derived a trendline in Excel that gives n as approximately -2.011, indicating a non-linear relationship. There is also a query about calculating an actual value for n and its relation to percent error, as well as the slope of the trendline representing a constant value k. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between potential and distance in the context of power laws.
dapavelko
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I am graphing Potential(Volts) y-axis vs distance (r) x axis. I am asked to fit a power function F(r)=Ar^n . Any ideas on how to do this? What is n supposed to represent?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Hi dapaveko, welcome to PF!

EDIT: 'n' is just some number (any number).

'n' is the power (the exponent). 'n' could be 1, or 2, or 3, or 4, or...

in which case the function would be linear, or quadratic, or cubic, or quartic, or ...

The point is that it's some sort of power law. What you get as a result for 'n' depends upon what exponent produces a curve that best fits your data. (I am assuming that you are trying to fit a power law function to some data. Otherwise your question doesn't make much sense).
 
Last edited:


r V
1 8.7
2 4.5
3 2.9
4 2.2
5 1.8
6 1.5

that is my data I got, and I made an excel. I added a trendline curved and got y=8.7715x^-2.011. The data was curved not linear? I am trying to associate the power function F(r)=Ar^n and determine n. Wouldn't n be the -2.011? Sorry your answer confused me so I added the data.
 


dapavelko said:
r V
1 8.7
2 4.5
3 2.9
4 2.2
5 1.8
6 1.5

that is my data I got, and I made an excel. I added a trendline curved and got y=8.7715x^-2.011.

Okay.

dapavelko said:
The data was curved not linear?

Are you asking me or telling me? Obviously if n is anything other than 1, then the data will not be linear. What were you expecting it to be like? Are the data curved? Does your fit look like a good fit?

dapavelko said:
I am trying to associate the power function F(r)=Ar^n and determine n. Wouldn't n be the -2.011?

Yes, of course. Excel has determined that n = -2.011 for you.

By the way, I edited my first post slightly.

dapavelko said:
Sorry your answer confused me so I added the data.

What, specifically, about it confused you?
 


ok I reread your post and I thought you were telling me it should be linear.

The question I am asked is...What I would expect "n" to be. Well I would expect it to be other than 1 because it is not a linear relationship ,the potential difference decreases with the first power of the distance. such as V=kQ/r

but is there a way I can calculate an n value? as I need to compute percent error and I need to find an actual value being the experimental value is given by excel?

Thanks for the help I think I was trying to make more out of what I was being asked.
 
Last edited:


also would the slope of the trend-line represent the constant value k? I plotted both V to r and and also the magnitude of E to R and I get a slope of aprox... 8.77 which seems close to the k value of 8.99*10^9 ?
 
Last edited:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top